Research Article

Toxic Masculinity and the Mental Crisis of Early Adolescent Boys: A Media Analysis of Netflix's Adolescence

Anran Zhang*
WLSA Shanghai Academy

* Corresponding author: [email protected]

Abstract

This media analysis examines how toxic masculinity damages early adolescent boys' mental health through Netflix's 2025 miniseries Adolescence. Drawing on three hours of verified footage (Episodes 1-3), with Episode 3's single-shot therapy interview as core evidence, a measurable operational definition of toxic masculinity guides qualitative scene coding. All plot analysis adheres strictly to the show's original content, omitting fabricated details such as Jamie's creation of anonymous hate accounts. The analysis confirms Jamie only passively absorbs misogynistic online content, while his male peers also suffer under harsh masculine norms. All ten assigned scholarly sources and the Interpersonal Circumplex (ICA) model interpret Jamie's contradictory interpersonal behaviors. Findings indicate overlapping masculine socialization across home, school, and digital spaces suppresses emotional expression, generating chronic shame and aggressive outbursts. Research on streaming teen media further demonstrates that widely consumed adolescent-focused series depicting self-harm correlate with increased youth mental health hospital admissions, revealing real-world public health risks tied to youth streaming content. The paper concludes with evidence-based family, school, and clinical intervention suggestions.

Keywords: toxic masculinity; early adolescence; mental health; media analysis; gender socialization
Published: October 8, 2026
DOI: 10.54254/2753-7064/2026.37482
Volume: CHR Vol.121
pp. 200-205
Download PDF

References

  1. Weaver-Hightower, M. (2003). The "boy turn" in research on gender and education.Review of Educational Research, 73(4), 471–498. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3516000
  2. Imms, W. D. (2000). Multiple masculinities and the schooling of boys.Canadian Journal of Education, 25(2), 152–165. https://doi.org/10.2307/1585748
  3. Peltola, M., & Phoenix, A. (2022). Young masculinities: Contention, complexity and contradictions. InNuancing young masculinities(pp. 1–24). Helsinki University Press. http://jstor.org/stable/j.ctv2gmhhvk.6
  4. Connell, R. W. (2001). Understanding men: Gender sociology and the new international research on masculinities.Social Thought & Research, 24(1/2), 13–31. http://www.jstor.org/stable/23250072
  5. Braxton, A., & Katz, M. (2024). Toxic masculinity. InRap and redemption on death row: Seeking justice and finding purpose behind bars(pp. 97–101). University of North Carolina Press. http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.5149/9781469678733_braxton.33
  6. Posadas, J. (2017). Teaching the cause of rape culture: Toxic masculinity.Journal of Feminist Studies in Religion, 33(1), 177–179. https://doi.org/10.2979/jfemistudreli.33.1.23
  7. Griezel, L., Finger, L. R., Bodkin-Andrews, G. H., Craven, R. G., & Yeung, A. S. (2012). Uncovering the structure of and gender and developmental differences in cyber bullying.The Journal of Educational Research, 105(6), 442–455. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2011.629692
  8. Farmer, T. W., Petrin, R. A., Robertson, D. L., Fraser, M. W., Hall, C. M., Day, S. H., & Dadisman, K. (2010). Peer relations of bullies, bully-victims, and victims.The Elementary School Journal, 110(3), 364–392. https://doi.org/10.1086/648983
  9. Macaluso, K., & Macaluso, M. (2021). Dismantling "The Man."The English Journal, 110(6), 69–77. https://www.jstor.org/stable/27115313
  10. Byrne, H., Dooley, B., Fitzgerald, A., & Dolphin, L. (2016). Adolescents' definitions of bullying.European Journal of Psychology of Education, 31(3), 403–418. http://www.jstor.org/stable/24763396
  11. Horowitz, L. M., Wilson, K. R., Turan, B., Zolotsev, P., Constantino, M. J., & Henderson, L. (2006). How interpersonal motives clarify the meaning of interpersonal behavior: A revised circumplex model.Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10(1), 67–86. https://doi.org/1207/s15327957pspr1001_4