Research on Political Ethical Alienation in the Space of the Other — Starting from Adolf Eichmann
Abstract
Modern anthropology and spatial politics advocate understanding and studying the “other,” reflecting on oneself through the “other.” Great eras demand both theoretical and practical innovation, and political ethics should never be metaphysical in the ivory tower. This article takes the relevant events of Adolf Eichmann, a high-ranking Nazi official during World War II, who indiscriminately massacred numerous Jews, as an example. It reflects and analyzes the breakdown of value rationality and the disregard and trampling of moral ethics under fascist authoritarianism during World War II. Combining relevant behavioral experiments, the study explores the causes of alienation from the perspectives of alienated subjects, motives, and opportunities. This leads to a discussion of solutions to ethical alienation in the process of social development, proposing ideas for overcoming potential political ethical dislocation through emphasis on quality education, balancing social systems and ethical morals, and calling for collective reflection and nurturing a sense of responsibility for others. Maintaining a clear self-awareness under the control of desires in the high-tech era is conducive to avoiding the quagmire of alienation and provides warnings and development ideas for the long-term development of our country’s politics.
References
- Chen, L. (2014). Recognition Politics in the Marginal Space. Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Social Science Edition, 2014(5), 52-58.
- Tong, Q. (2010). Power, Capital, and Interstitial Space. In Social Science Literature, 93. Beijing: Social Sciences Academic Press.
- Arendt, H. (2020). Eichmann in Jerusalem: A Report on the Banality of Evil (Q. Zhou, Trans.). Beijing: Beijing Daily Press.
- Wang, X. (2017). Levinas’ Thought on “the Other.” China Social Sciences Daily.
- Han, Z. (2020). Ethical Critique of Zygmunt Bauman on the Holocaust. Studies on East European Thought, 2020(2), 7-13.
- Sun, T., & Sun, C. (2014). A Brief Analysis of Modernity and the Holocaust. Journal of Chongqing University of Science and Technology, 2014(9), 36-39.
- Sun, Y. (2015). Eichmann in Jerusalem and Arendt’s Theories of Active and Spiritual Life. In Proceedings of Shandong University.
- Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1994). What Is Philosophy? (P. 17). New York: Columbia University Press.
- Wang, X. (2009). Spatial Philosophy and Spatial Politics: Interpretation and Critique of Foucault’s Heterotopia Theory. Tianjin Social Sciences, 2009(3), 11-18.
- Foucault, M. (1999). Discipline and Punish (B. Liu & Y. Yang, Trans.). Beijing: Sanlian Bookstore.
- Young, I. M. (1990). Justice and the Politics of Difference. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
- Guo, K. (2018). A Comparative Study of Marx and Sartre’s Alienation Theory. Century Bridge, 2018(1), 90-92.
- Liao, W. (2016). Historical Logical Generation of Marx’s Alienation Theory. (Unpublished master’s thesis, Hainan University).
- Huang, W. (2021). On Hegel’s Concept of Judaism. (Unpublished master’s thesis, Jilin University).
- Li, J., & Li, H. (2008). On the Dilemma of Administrative Loyalty and Its Resolution: A Case Study of Eichmann’s “Banality of Evil.” Journal of Hunan Normal University, Social Sciences Edition, 2008(3), 35-39.
- Xiao, H. (2001). Bottom Line Ethics and Sin Responsibility—A Review of the Trial of Adolf Eichmann. Open Times, 2001(10), 97-102.
- Bauman, Z. (2011). Modernity and the Holocaust (Y. Yang & J. Shi, Trans.). Nanjing: Yilin Press.
- Chen, X. (2013). Several Issues to Be Noted in Current Marxist Studies. Beijing Daily, 2013.
- Marx, K., & Engels, F. (Selected Works, Vol. 4). Beijing: People’s Publishing House.
- Jaspers, K. (1998). The Tragedy’s Transcendence. Beijing: Workers Press.
- Harvey, D. (2015). Justice, Nature and the Geography of Difference (D. Hu, Trans.). Shanghai: Shanghai People’s Publishing House.
- Pan, K., & Wang, D. (2016). Political Alienation under the Background of Western Capital Power. Scientific Socialism, 2016(3), 149-153.