Research Article

Differences Between Two Shakespearean Adaptations: An Analysis of Two Film Adaptations of The Tempest from the Perspective of Gender

Xinyu KongUniversity of Macau*

* Corresponding author: [email protected]

Abstract

In recent years, some social phenomenon (e.g. changes in clothing of male and female) reveals that the gender identity is gradually changing. This essay mainly focuses on analyzing gender differences in the two adaptations of Shakespeare’s tragicomedy The Tempest. The two selected films are The Tempest directed by George Schaefer in 1960 and directed by Julie Taymor in 2010. This essay is attempting to find out in what way do the male and female characters change in the film in 2010 compared with the film in 1960. Although, Shakespeare’s work had already been adapted and researched by a considerable number of playwrights, directors and scholars, as the last work of Shakespeare, The Tempest has many uniqueness. This essay will analyze the two films from the perspective of film technology and text, pointing out the differences between the male and female characters in the two films, so as to reflect on the transformations of gender concepts and the trend of female social status.

Keywords: Shakespeare; film adaptation; gender studies
Published: January 3, 2024
DOI: 10.54254/2753-7064/26/20232080
Volume: CHR Vol.26
pp. 256-266
Download PDF

References

  1. Shakespeare, W., Clark, W. G., & Wright, W. A. (2009). The Cambridge Shakespeare: THE TEMPEST.
  2. Schaefer, G. (Director). (1960). The Tempest [Film]. Mumbai Mantra Media.
  3. Taymor, J. (Director). (2010). The Tempest [Film]. Chartoff Productions.
  4. Brown, D. (2000). Film and theory: An anthology. Reference Reviews, 14(7), 36-36.
  5. Balázs, B. (2011). Béla balázs: Early film theory. Visible Man & the Spirit of Film.
  6. Leitch, T. (Ed.) The Oxford handbook of adaptation studies. New York: Oxford University Press, 2017, 784 p.
  7. Astruc, A. (1968). The birth of a new avant-barde: La camera-stylo.
  8. Bluestone, G. (1961). Adaptation or evasion: \"Elmer gantry\". Film Quarterly, 14(3), 15-19
  9. Cartmell, D. & Whelehan. I. (1999) Adaptations: From text to screen, screen to text. Routledge.
  10. Hutcheon, L. (2006). A theory of adaptation. Routledge.
  11. Zhang, C. (2009). Adaptation studies and adaptation research. Foreign Literature Review (3), 12.
  12. Hiroshi, S. (2017). Shakespeare in China: A history of Chinese reception of Shakespeare. Guangdong People's Publishing House.
  13. Borden, I., Penner, B., Rendell, J., & Pilcher, J. (2004). 50 key concepts in gender studies. Routledge.
  14. Davis, K. E., Evans, M. S., & Lorber, J. (2004). Handbook for gender and women's studies. Language.
  15. Braithwaite, A., & Orr, C. M. (2016). Everyday women's and gender studies: Introductory concepts. Routledge.
  16. Launius, C., & Hassel, H. (2015). Threshold concepts in women and gender studies: Ways of seeing, thinking, and knowing.
  17. Butler, J. (1990). Gender trouble.
  18. Beauvoir, S., & Cheng, C. (2015). The second sex. Shanghai Translation Publishing House.