Research Article

Gender Inequality in Workplace: A Perspective of Gender Narrative

Nianzhi LiuYK Pao School*

* Corresponding author: [email protected]

Abstract

The prejudice and discrimination toward femininity lasted from the ancient world to today's workplace. Women frequently faced judgments, with a particular focus on anti-feminity, this study explores the gender differences in career expectations, the unequal distribution of career opportunities, and disparities in unemployment rates which all contribute to this pervasive imbalance. Firstly, this research investigates how societal norms and stereotypes shape gendered career expectations. By analyzing the pressures that steer individuals towards specific career paths, it becomes evident that femininity was often marginalized, leading to limited career choices for women. Secondly, this research examines the unequal distribution of career opportunities, revealing how institutional and structural factors perpetuate gender disparities. The scarcity of women in leadership positions and male-dominated industries further entrenches the absence of femininity within workplace narratives. Lastly, the study uncovers the gender-based disparities in unemployment rates, highlighting the systemic biases that hinder women's access to stable employment, particularly during economic downturns.

Keywords: Gender inequality; discrimination; stereotype; workplace
Published: January 3, 2024
DOI: 10.54254/2753-7064/25/20231852
Volume: CHR Vol.25
pp. 52-57
Download PDF

References

  1. Hoskin, R. A. (2019). Femmephobia: The role of anti-femininity and gender policing in LGBTQ+ people’s. experiences of discrimination. Sex Roles, 81(11–12), 686–703. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-019-01021-3
  2. University, S. (2021, December 15). A hidden obstacle for women in Academia. Stanford News. https://news.stanford.edu/2021/12/16/hidden-obstacle-women-academia/
  3. Eagly, Alice H., and Steven J. Karau. (2002) “Role Congruity Theory of Prejudice toward Female Leaders.” Psychological Review 109, no. 3: 573–98. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.109.3.573.
  4. ACKER, JOAN. (1990) “Hierarchies, Jobs, Bodies:” Gender & Society 4, no. 2: 139–58. https://doi.org/10.1177/089124390004002002.
  5. Williams, Joan C., and Rachel Dempsey. (2020). What works for women at work, https://doi.org/10.18574/nyu/9781479814688.001.0001.
  6. U.S. Bureau of Labor. (2023), “Employment Status of the Civilian Noninstitutional Population by Age, Sex, and Race.” https://www.bls.gov/cps/cpsaat03.htm.
  7. Glass, Jennifer. (2004) “Blessing or Curse?” Work and Occupations 31, no. 3: 367–94. https://doi.org/10.1177/0730888404266364.
  8. Dawson, Patricia A. (2014),“Resource Review: Why so Few? Women in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics.” Journal of Youth Development 9, no. 4: 110–12. https://doi.org/10.5195/jyd.2014.44.
  9. Rudman, Laurie A., and Peter Glick. (2001), “Prescriptive Gender Stereotypes and Backlash toward Agentic Women.” Journal of Social Issues 57, no. 4: 743–62. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00239.
  10. Brescoll, Victoria L., and Eric Luis Uhlmann. (2008) “Can an Angry Woman Get Ahead?” Psychological Science 19, no. 3: 268–75. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02079.x.