Research Article

Exploring on the Poetic Pragmatic Structure in Chinese Classical Philosophical Texts

Mingzhen WenMalvern College Qingdao*

* Corresponding author: [email protected]

Abstract

In Chinese classical philosophical texts, the use of poetic explications to convey concepts is a unique and fascinating phenomenon. Unlike Western philosophy, where conceptions are often explained by definition of connotation and extension. Classical Chinese philosophy relies on direct experiential understanding through poetry and metaphorical language. This pragmatic structure in Classical Chinese allows for a deeper connection between the reader and the text, even opening up the possibility of personal interpretation. By recalling or forming certain experiences, even mystical ones, readers can gain a more profound understanding of the concepts being discussed. This article explores the ontology of the unity of heaven and man(天人和一) that is preset in these texts and makes this process (what people called tiwu(体悟)) possible. Taking the Five Elements as an example, this article reveals unique concepts born on the basis of this pragmatic structure that is different from Western philosophy.

Keywords: Chinese philosophy; Poetry; Classical Chinese text
Published: January 3, 2024
DOI: 10.54254/2753-7064/24/20231636
Volume: CHR Vol.24
pp. 146-149
Download PDF

References

  1. Heideggerm. Eggerm. Voträge und Aufsätze[M]. GA7 frankfurt am main; Vitorio Klostermann
  2. Chinese Text Project. Shuo Wen Jie Zi Volume 10 II heart Part. July 2 2015 . September 4 2023. https://www. qqxiuzi. cn/hanyu/shuowenjiezi/?zi=53460
  3. Chinese Text Project. Shang Shu Hongfan(Great Plan). October 10 2016. September 4 2023. https://ctext. org/shang-shu/great-plan/zhs?en=on
  4. Gaston Bachelard, the Poetics of Space, trans. By Maria Jolas, Beacon Press Boston, 1963.
  5. Dao De Jing: A Philosophical Translation, Ballantine Books , December 2003
  6. Chinese Text Project Shuo Wen Jie Zi Volume 4 II deep Part . July 5 2015 . September 4 2023. https://www. qqxiuzi. cn/hanyu/shuowenjiezi/?zi=53502
  7. J. Derrida. La difference Ln:Marges de la Philosophie[M]. Paris:Minuit, 1972.
  8. Shen, Y. (1987). On the structure and understanding of poetic oxymoron. Poetics Today, 8(1), 105-122.
  9. Gruyter, D. (2016). Linguistic structures in poetry (Vol. 23). Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co KG.
  10. Fishelov, D. (1993). Poetic and non-poetic simile: Structure, semantics, rhetoric. Poetics Today, 1-23.