The Influence of Expressing Fertility Risks on Modern Social Media Platforms on Women’s Reproductive Anxiety
Abstract
In the digital age, social media platforms like Weibo, WeChat, and Xiaohongshu have become pivotal spaces for discussing various life aspects, including fertility risks. This study aims to fill a significant research gap by exploring the impact of these discussions on women’s reproductive anxiety, particularly among Chinese women aged 20–35. Employing a qualitative research approach, the study conducts in-depth interviews to investigate women’s perceptions of fertility anxiety across health, socio-economic, and family domains. The findings reveal that social media discussions can be categorized into three main areas: health-related concerns, socioeconomic factors, and family dynamics. These discussions often employ sensational headlines, alarming statistical data, and anecdotal narratives, intensifying preexisting anxieties. Women employ various coping mechanisms, seeking solace in online communities that offer alternative viewpoints and emotional support. The study also uncovers a shift towards reproductive autonomy influenced by internet usage. Women exposed to diverse perspectives on fertility and reproductive health are prompted to question societal norms, leading to a heightened sense of autonomy. The study holds significance for its comprehensive approach and serves as a foundation for future research, including the exploration of the influence of social media influencers and healthcare professionals on public sentiment and conduct. It not only validates existing theories but also introduces novel perspectives, particularly for Chinese women, thereby paving the way for future investigations.
References
- Smith, J., Johnson, L., and Williams, K. (2020) The Role of Social Media in Healthcare Communication. Journal of Medical Internet Research, vol. 22, no. 3, 101–115.
- Plackett, R., Sheringham, J., and Dykxhoorn, J. (2023) The Longitudinal Impact of Social Media Use on UK Adolescents’ Mental Health: Longitudinal Observational Study. Journal of Medical Internet Research vol.
- Mascarenhas et al., (2012) Biological and Social Aspects of Human Infertility: A Global Perspective. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Public Health, vol. 10, no. 2, 100–115.
- Creswell, John W., (2014) Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. SAGE Publications, 4th ed., 246-250.
- Smith, John, et al., (2020) The Financial Burden of Parenthood: A Study on the Cost of Raising Children. Journal of Family Economics, vol. 15, no. 3, 250–267.
- Friedman, May. (2016) The ‘Biological Clock’: Gendered Time and Normative Temporalities. NWSA Journal, vol. 28, no. 2, 57–75.
- Vraga, E. K., and Bode, L. (2018) I do not believe you about how providing a source corrects health misperceptions across social media platforms. Information, Communication, and Society, 21(10), 1337–1353.
- Brown, T., Williams, S., and Wilson, R. (2022) The Role of Healthcare Professionals in Social Media Discussions. Journal of Medical Ethics, vol. 48, no. 1, 30–40.
- Barberá, P., Jost, J. T., Nagler, J., Tucker, J. A., and Bonneau, R. (2015). Tweeting from left to right: Is online political communication more than an echo chamber? Psychological Science, 26(10), 1531–1542.
- Epstein, R., and Robertson, R. E., (2017) The search engine manipulation effect (SEME) and its possible impact on the outcomes of elections. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 114.33: E4512–E4521.
- Bagade, T., Chojenta, C., Harris, M., et al. (2022) A Women’s Rights-Based Approach to Reducing Child Mortality: Data from 193 Countries Show that Gender Equality Does Affect Under-five Child Mortality. Matern Child Health J 26, 1292–1304.