Avatar Design in Education: Realistic vs. Cartoonish Representation and Acceptability
Abstract
This paper examines the variations in attitudes towards avatars across different age groups. The study reveals that middle-aged individuals prioritize the economic advantages of avatars but express dissatisfaction with their lack of authenticity and emotional communication capabilities. In contrast, the younger generation gravitates towards interacting with real people as they offer a more genuine and personalized communication experience. Real individuals can convey information through facial expressions, voice, and body language, meeting the youth's desire for effective and sensory communication. Furthermore, real people can adapt and respond flexibly to user feedback and contextual cues, aligning with the youth's expectations for customization and individuality. Opinions within the teenage group differ, with some acknowledging the potential of avatars to provide a wealth of knowledge and customization. They appreciate the ability to tailor the avatar's characteristics and services to their specific needs. Conversely, another portion of the teenage group perceives avatars as lacking authenticity and the ability to share personal experiences. They value the human element in communication and find avatars unable to replicate the depth of emotional connection that real individuals offer. Overall, the attitudes towards avatars among different age groups are influenced by various factors such as economic considerations, human nature, sensory experiences, and effectiveness. These differences reflect the diverse needs and values of each age group. Understanding these nuanced perspectives can inform the design and implementation of avatar technologies to better cater to the expectations and preferences of different age demographics.
References
- Alzahrani, A. I., & Alalwan, N. F. (2020). The impact of avatar appearance on students' engagement and learning in virtual reality educational environments. Interactive Learning Environments, 28(8), 1064-1079.
- Cheng, K. H., & Tsai, C. C. (2013). Affordances of augmented reality in science learning: Suggestions for future research. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 22(4), 449-462.
- Dickey, M. D. (2005). Three-dimensional virtual worlds and distance learning: Two case studies of Active Worlds as a medium for distance education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 36(3), 439-451.
- Hinojo-Lucena, F. J., Aznar-Díaz, I., & Cáceres-Reche, M. P. (2018). Avatar-based virtual reality in education: A review of the literature. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 21(1), 58-69.
- Liu, M., Horton, L., Kang, J., & Kim, J. (2017). The influence of avatar-based customization on learning and engagement in educational virtual reality. Educational Technology Research and Development, 65(4), 909-926.
- Bailenson, J. N., Yee, N., Blascovich, J., Beall, A. C., Lundblad, N., & Jin, M. (2008). The use of immersive virtual reality in the learning sciences: Digital transformations of teachers, students, and social context. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 17(1), 102-141.
- Johnson-Glenberg, M. C., Birchfield, D., Megowan-Romanowicz, C., & Snow, E. L. (2016). Comparing learning gains and student preferences when using augmented reality sandbox and touch table for teaching earth science. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 54(4), 479-498.
- Liew, T. W., & Koh, N. H. (2017). Avatar-based virtual reality in education: Benefits and challenges. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 20(1), 110-121.
- Pellas, N., Kazanidis, I., & Peroutseas, E. (2018). The use of avatars in education: A scoping review. Education and Information Technologies, 23(6), 2811-2836.
- Wang, Y., & Sun, Y. (2019). The effects of avatar appearance on students' learning in virtual reality environments: The mediating role of presence. Computers & Education, 137, 1-11.
- Lu, J., Yu, C. S., Liu, C., & Yao, X. (2010). Technology acceptance model for wireless internet. Computers & Education, 55(1), 355-364.