An Analysis of the Formation and Solidification of Group Concepts in Taiwan During the Japanese Rule and Postwar Periods
Abstract
This paper presents a comparative analysis on Taiwan’s behavior under different colonizers during distinct historical periods: Japanese rule (1895-1945) and the post-war era (1945-present). The objective is to examine and compare the formation and solidification of group concepts in these two situations. An intriguing finding is Taiwan’s decision to relinquish its “Chinese” identity and instead refer to Japan as its “mother country” in high school history textbooks. This shift raises questions about the underlying psychological phenomena driving Taiwan’s reaction. The study hypothesizes that such behavior can be attributed to the influential power wielded by social leaders, who shape the environment to align with their desires and mold the perception of Japan as a “country” rather than a colonizer. Encounters with diverse individuals stimulate different levels of identity, leading to the solidification of group concepts. This distinction between cultural influences and national favoritism is particularly notable during the two periods of rule under consideration. While the Japanese rule played a significant role in Taiwan’s development, the passage of time has contributed to a growing societal awakening of consciousness. Consequently, a favorable view of Japan has emerged, accompanied by an increased sense of “subjectivity” within Taiwan. In conclusion, this analysis suggests that Taiwan’s response to different colonizers can be best understood as a psychological phenomenon inherent in human behavior. It is heavily influenced by the manipulation of social leaders, who shape the environment, as well as the solidification of group concepts through encounters with diverse individuals.
References
- Dogs to Pigs: Declassifying U.S. Intelligence Files on the Eve of February 28, by Nancy Hsu Fleming, translated by Tsai Ding-gui, Taipei: Avant-Garde Publishing House, 2009.
- Tkacik, John J., Jr. (2005). Reassessing the “One China” Policy: Challenges to the One-China Policy in U.S. Academia and Politics. Bootorabi, F., Haapasalo, J., Smith, E., Haapasalo, H. and Parkkila, S. (2011) Carbonic Anhydrase VII-A Potential Prognostic Marker in Gliomas. Health, 3, 6-12.
- Wu, & Rwei-Ren. (2016). The lilliputian dreams: preliminary observations of nationalism in okinawa, taiwan and hong kong. Nations & Nationalism.
- Chang, Yen-Hsien, 1994, Fifty years of political blood and tears, and Chou, Wan-Mei, 1996, Imperialization movements in Taiwan and Korea from a comparative viewpoint (1937-1945).
- Lan, Hongyue (2015). ‘Meiji Knowledge’ and the Politics of Colonial Taiwan: ‘Nationality’ Discourse and Assimilation Policies before the 1920s.
- The transformative course of civic education in Taiwan: changes and challenges in the post-war period (1945-1949) p. 53, Mei-Ying Tang, Taiwan Journal of Human Rights Volume 3, Issue 4, 2016-12.
- Ethnic Groups and the Nation: The Formation of Hakka Identity in the Six Piles (1683-1973) (page archive backup in the Internet Archive), p. 256, Li-Hua Chen, Publication Center, National Taiwan University, 2015-11-02.
- Yang, Bi-Chuan. (1996). Biography of Shinpei Goto. Hitotsubashi Press. p. 62.
- Chen, Senji. (2015). A Review of American Academic Views on U.S. Taiwan Policy. International Political Studies, Vol. 38(2), 142-148.
- Lai, Zehan. Research Report on the February 28th Incident. Taipei, Taiwan: Times Culture. 1994-02-20. isbn 978-9571309064.