Research Article

Corporate Obligations in Anti-Sexual Harassment in the Workplace: A Comparison Based on Chinese and U.S. Laws

Jiajun BiOcean University of China*

* Corresponding author: [email protected]

Abstract

A major societal issue nowadays is workplace sexual harassment. It has become increasingly important to clarify the responsibilities of enterprises further, improve legislation in related areas, and analyze the governance experiences of different countries. This paper adopts a comparative textual analysis, combining Chinese and American laws and relevant cases to show the history of changes and different ways of regulating workplace sexual harassment in both countries. Combining the advantages and disadvantages of the two, the author proposes a regulatory model centered on gender discrimination and combined with the protection of human dignity. This will provide theoretical support for establishing a sound system of ex-ante prevention and ex-post relief. At the same time, this paper provides a systematic explanation of sexual harassment in the workplace from multiple perspectives, such as the evidence system and legal and economic analysis. This article would provide new perspectives for the effective regulation of such issues.

Keywords: corporate obligations; sex discrimination; sexual harassment in the workplace; personal dignity
Published: November 20, 2023
DOI: 10.54254/2753-7064/15/20230747
Volume: CHR Vol.15
pp. 216-221
Download PDF

References

  1. Kearl, H. National Sexual Abuse Report. Stop Street Harassment. February 21, 2018. Retrieved on September 3, 2023. Retrieved from: https://stopstreetharassment.org/our-work/nationalstudy/2018-national-sexual-abuse-report/
  2. Feldblum, C.R. and Lipnic, V.A. elect Task Force on the Study of Harassment in the Workplace. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. June, 2016. Retrieved on September 3, 2023. Retrieved from: https://www.eeoc.gov/select-task-force-study-harassment-workplace#
  3. The National People’s Congress of the People’s Republic of China. Law of the People’s Republic of China on the Protection of Women’s Rights and Interests (2005 Amendment). August 28, 2005. Retrieved on September 3, 2023. Retrieve from: http://www.npc.gov.cn/npc/c198/200508/6641e21c3586457c85c7770c26736bd2.shtml
  4. National Database of Laws and Regulations. Special Rules on the Labor Protection of Female Employees. April 28, 2012. Retrieve on September 3, 2023. Retrieved from: https://flk.npc.gov.cn/detail2.html?ZmY4MDgwODE2ZjNjYmIzYzAxNmY0MTBmMWVkNTE0NTE
  5. The State Council of the People’s Republic of China. Civil Code of the People’s Republic of China. June 1, 2020. Retrieved on September 3, 2023. Retrieved from: https://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2020-06/01/content_5516649.htm
  6. Weishan County People’s Court. Law of the People’s Republic of China on the Protection of Women’s Rights and Interests (2022 Revision). October 30, 2022. Retrieved on September 3, 2023. Retrieved from: http://www.sdcourt.gov.cn/jningweisfy/385991/385992/9012962/index.html
  7. JUSTIA US Law. Williams v. Saxbe, 413 F. Supp. 654 (D.D.C. 1976). April 20, 1976. Retrieved on September 4, 2023. Retrieve from: https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/FSupp/413/654/1660985/
  8. JUSTIA US Law. Bundy v. Jackson, 641 F.2d 934 (D.C. Cir. 1981). January 12, 1981. Retrieved on September 4, 2023. Retrieved from: https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/F2/641/934/25673/
  9. JUSTIA U.S. Supreme Court. Meritor Savings Bank v. Vinson, 477 U.S. 57 (1986). June 19, 1986. Retrieved on September 4, 2023. Retrieved from: https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/477/57/
  10. McDonald, P. (2012). Workplace sexual harassment 30 years on: A review of the literature. International Journal of Management Reviews, 14(1), 1-17.
  11. Wang, H. Legislative and judicial responses to workplace sexual harassment in mainland China: Progress and drawbacks. Frontiers in Public Health, 2022(10): 1000488.
  12. Hemel, D., & Lund, D. S. (2018). SEXUAL HARASSMENT AND CORPORATE LAW. Columbia Law Review, 118(6), 1583–1680. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26511247
  13. Posner, R. A. (2014). Economic analysis of law. Aspen Publishing.