Communications in Humanities Research ISSN: 2753-7072
Home> Volumes> Volume CHR Vol.14> Article
Research Article

Analysis of the Reasons for the Stigmatization of Feminism in Virtual Chinese Society-psychological Perspective

Yuhan LiUniversity of Nottingham*

* Corresponding author: [email protected]

Abstract

The flourishing of feminism in modern China has brought more vitality to the thought of a new era in China, especially today when Internet technology is highly popularized and women’s self-awareness is further awakened. However, a large volume of observations and studies have pointed to the severe stigmatization of Chinese local feminism on the virtual society. While previous studies have shed light on the causes of such a social phenomenon, explanations of each individual’s psychological mechanism in this phenomenon have yet to be added. This study used Zhihu, China’s popular universal question-and-answer platform, as a community to collect and code responses on the causes of Chinese feminist stigmatization, and conducted an analysis of internal and external factors leading to the causes of stigmatization based on the general public’s perceptions of feminist activities in the virtual society, and found that the general public’s responses on Zhihu all converged to point to seven causes, namely: feminist behaviors are radical and there are internal disagreements that are difficult to reconcile, misunderstanding or stereotyping of the original intent of feminism by the general public, deterioration of the relationship between feminists and outgroups by the media, the herd effect among feminist outgroups leading to wider stigmatization of feminism, the constraints of traditional attitudes, and the conflict of social interests between feminism and outgroups. Ultimately, the psychological mechanisms behind the causes of stigmatization were found to be intertwined and interacting.

Keywords: feminism; stigma; social psychology; psychology; sociology
Published: November 20, 2023
DOI: 10.54254/2753-7064/14/20230492
Volume: CHR Vol.14
pp. 280-289
Download PDF

References

  1. Wang, L., & Li, L. (2018). The Stigmatization of Streamers and their Ethical Dilemmas: A Netnography Study. Journalism & Communication Revire, 71(4), 107-117. https://doi.org/10.14086/j.cnki.xwycbpl.2018.04.010
  2. Liu, H, J., & Pan, L. (2020). Analysis of Feminist Stigmatization Phenomenon and Countermeasures in China’s Virtual Society. Journal of Harbin University, 41(2), 16-20.
  3. Song, B. (2021). Contemporary Business Practices of the Ru (Confucian) Ethic of “Three Guides and Five Constant Virtues” in Asia and Beyond. Religions, 12(10), 895. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel12100895
  4. Liu, M. (2016). UW Tacoma Digital Commons Global Honors Theses Global Honors Program The Development of Chinese Feminism on Weibo.
  5. Shen, Y. (2011). China in the “Post-Patriarchal Era.” Chinese Sociology & Anthropology, 43(4), 5–23. https://doi.org/10.2753/csa0009-4625430401
  6. Shi, Q. (2023). An overview of the effects of feminist stigmatization on Chinese online platforms. Journal of Education, Humanities and Social Sciences, 8, 779–785. https://doi.org/10.54097/ehss.v8i.4355
  7. Yuen, S. (2015). Friend or Foe? China Perspectives, 2015(3), 51–56. https://doi.org/10.4000/chinaperspectives.6807
  8. Wang, Q. (2018). From “Non-governmental Organizing” to “Outer-system”—Feminism and Feminist Resistance in Post-2000 China. NORA - Nordic Journal of Feminist and Gender Research, 26(4), 260–277. https://doi.org/10.1080/08038740.2018.1531058
  9. Han, X. (2018). Searching for an online space for feminism? The Chinese feminist group Gender Watch Women’s Voice and its changing approaches to online misogyny. Feminist Media Studies, 18(4), 734–749. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2018.1447430
  10. Wang, B., & Driscoll, C. (2019b). Chinese feminists on social media: articulating different voices, building strategic alliances. Continuum, 33(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/10304312.2018.1532492
  11. Zeng, X., He, M., & Liu, Y. (2022). A Study of Feminist Advertising Effectiveness in the Context of Weibo Commentary. Juournalism & Communication Review, 75(3), 64-83. https://doi.org/10.14086/j.cnki.xwycbpl.2022.03.006
  12. Wan, J. (2020) Research on the Stigmatization of “Feminism” in the context of Weibo. Hainan Normal University,MA thesis.
  13. Tajfel, H., Billig, M. G., Bundy, R. P., & Flament, C. (1971). Social categorization and intergroup behaviour. European Journal of Social Psychology, 1(2), 149–178. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420010202
  14. Diehl, M. (1990b). The Minimal Group Paradigm: Theoretical Explanations and Empirical Findings. European Review of Social Psychology, 1(1), 263–292. https://doi.org/10.1080/14792779108401864
  15. Tajfel, H. (2001). Experiments in intergroup discrimination. In M. A. Hogg & D. Abrams (Eds.), Key readings in social psychology. Intergroup relations: Essential readings (p. 178-187). Psychology Press
  16. Hart, W., Albarracín, D., Eagly, A. H., Brechan, I., Lindberg, M. J., & Merrill, L. (2009). Feeling validated versus being correct: a meta-analysis of selective exposure to information. Psychological bulletin, 135(4), 555.
  17. Iyengar, S., & Hahn, K. S. (2009). Red media, blue media: Evidence of ideological selectivity in media use. Journal of communication, 59(1), 19-39.
  18. Knobloch-Westerwick, S. (2014). Choice and preference in media use: Advances in selective exposure theory and research.
  19. Sunstein, C. R. (2007). Republic. com. Princeton university press.
  20. Edwards, K., & Smith, E. E. (1996). A disconfirmation bias in the evaluation of arguments. Journal of personality and social psychology, 71(1), 5.
  21. Taber, C. S., & Lodge, M. (2006). Motivated skepticism in the evaluation of political beliefs. American journal of political science, 50(3), 755-769.
  22. Buder, J., Rabl, L., Feiks, M., Badermann, M., & Zurstiege, G. (2021). Does negatively toned language use on social media lead to attitude polarization? Computers in Human Behavior, 116, 106663. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106663
  23. Baumeister, R. F., Bratslavsky, E., Finkenauer, C., & Vohs, K. D. (2001). Bad is Stronger than Good. Review of General Psychology, 5(4), 323–370.
  24. Wilder, D. A., Simon, A. F., & Faith, M. (1996). Enhancing the impact of counterstereotypic information: Dispositional attributions for deviance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(2), 276–287. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.71.2.276
  25. Liu, X., & Zuo, B.. (2006). Psychological Mechanisms of Gender Stereotype Maintenance. Advances in Psychological Science, 14(3), 456-461.
  26. Zhang, X., & Cai, H. (2021). Emotional Transmission and Social Governance in the Online Public Opinion Arena. Media Observer.
  27. Trussler, M., & Soroka, S. (2014). Consumer Demand for Cynical and Negative News Frames. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 19(3), 360–379. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161214524832
  28. Glick P. &Fiske S.T . (1996). The ambivalent sexism inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,70(3), 491-512.
  29. Zhang, S., Xie, J., & Wu, M. (2019). Sweet poison: How does benevolent sexism affect women’s career development? Advances in Psychological Science, 27(8), 1478. https://doi.org/10.3724/sp.j.1042.2019.01478
  30. Liao, S. (2023). The platformization of misogyny: Popular media, gender politics, and misogyny in China’s state-market nexus. Media, Culture & Society, 016344372211469. https://doi.org/10.1177/01634437221146905
  31. Glick P., Fiske S. T., Mladinic A., Saiz J. L., Abrams D., & Masser B., …L6pez W. L . (2000). Beyond prejudice as simple antipathy: Hostile and benevolent sexism across cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,79(5), 763-75.
  32. Kilianski S.., &Rudman L.A . (1998). Wanting it both ways: Do women approve of benevolent sexism? Sex Roles,39(5-6), 333-352.
  33. Gustave Le Bon. (2019). CROWD : a study of the popular mind. Digireads Com.
  34. Anderson, N. H., & Barrios, A. A. (1961). Primacy effects in personality impression formation. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 63(2), 346–350. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0046719
  35. Liang, J., Ren, Z., Huang, W., & He, Y. (2023, February). China Population Forecast Report 2023 Edition.
  36. Wei, Z., & Xuyang, L. (2019, April 25). The “Happy Singles” of Highly Educated Women in China. Www.xml-Data.org. http://www.xml-data.org/CJYJ/html/01cfa813-9260-4420-8899-9d3f534aee07.htm
  37. Zhiliang Recruitment, (2023) 2023 Survey on the Current Situation of Chinese Women in the Workplace. Retrieved from: http://Zhaopin.com [2023-8-16].
  38. Duckitt, J. (1994). The Social Psychology of Prejudice. Westport, CT.: Prager. pp. 157–179.
  39. Sidanius, J., & Pratto, F. (1999). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139175043