Research Article

An Analysis of the Policy Change from “One-Child” to “the Universal Two-Child” in China -- Based on the Theories of the Advocacy Coalition Framework

Fu JinGuangzhou College of Technology and Business*

* Corresponding author: [email protected]

Abstract

In the early 20th century, China gradually adjusted its family planning policy due to the unbalanced population structure. From the selective two-child policy in 2013 to the universal two-child policy in 2016, China ended the one-child policy that had lasted for decades. In fact, after the implementation of the selective two-child policy, it has always been a hot topic of public debate. However, the government has been cautious about this issue and has yet to make a clear statement. After much debate, the universal two-child policy was introduced. The existing literature mainly analyzes the reason and purpose of introducing the two-child policy but rarely analyzes the policy agenda setting in the process of policy change. Therefore, this paper will analyze China’s fertility system based on the agenda-setting process’s internal mechanism. As the leading theory of agenda setting, the Advocacy Coalition Framework (ACF) helps explain the causal relationship between the policy of “one child” and the policy of “universal two-child policy” in China; this provides a new perspective for understanding China’s general and significant policy changes. Therefore, this paper will analyze the internal logic and the dynamic mechanism of the process of two-child policy change and assess the interpretation limits of the Advocacy Coalition Framework in the policy process in China.

Keywords: the policy of “one child”; the universal two-child policy; the Advocacy Coalition Framework; policy learning; policy change
Published: November 20, 2023
DOI: 10.54254/2753-7064/14/20230398
Volume: CHR Vol.14
pp. 25-30
Download PDF

References

  1. Ike, R.M. (2009). Advocacy coalition framework: An approach to critical theory and belief systems in policy making. Paper prepared for the Annual Convention of the British Political Studies Association, Manchester, UK, April 7 – 9.
  2. Sabatier, P.A. et.al. (Eds.) (2014). Theories of the policy process. Third Edition. Boulder, CO: Westview Press. Chapters 6 (ACF).
  3. Weible, C.M., Heikkila, T., deLeon, P. and Sabatier, P.A. (2012). Understanding and influencing the policy process. Policy sciences, 45: 1-21.
  4. Ce. Z. (2016). Research on the Change from “One Child” Policy to “Two Child” Policy from the Perspective of ACF. Retrieved from https://wenku.baidu.com/view/57804eae27d3240c8547efc4.html.
  5. Lingyun.J.(2014). Study on the Dynamic Mechanism of China’s Two-Child Policy Changes——An Analysis Based on the ACF. Retrieved from https://wenku.baidu.com/view/57804eae27d3240c8547efc4.html.
  6. Can.W. (2017). The policy change logic of the “one child” policy to the “two-child” policy is based on the analysis of the ACF. Retrieved from http://www.doc88.com/p-9939660506338.html.