Civil Litigation Mechanism for the Return of Stolen Artifacts from the US: An Example of Taizong Horses
Abstract
A large number of ancient artifacts were stolen, plundered, and displaced abroad due to aggressions and wars in the early 1900s, and the US is one of the largest recipients of stolen artifacts from around the world. In past practices, negotiation and purchasing have been the main means to recover these lost artifacts. This article argues that legal means, especially the civil litigation approach, can play a unique role in recovery. Through analyzing original ownership, bona fide acquisition, and the statute of limitations in domestic law, the passage demonstrates the feasibility and effectiveness of litigation for the return of artifacts in the US. This paper also analyzes the civil litigation mechanism for the recovery of international stolen cultural property under the American legal system by taking the Chinese cultural relic Taizong Horse exhibited in the Museum of the University of Pennsylvania as an example and proves that civil litigation for the recovery of international cultural relics is completely feasible.
References
- TAIZONG HORSES, Penn Museum, Online Collections, https://www.penn.museum/collections/highlights/asian/taizonghorses.php, visited on 7 July 2023.
- Yangchun Villagers’ Committee & Dongpu Villagers’ Committee of Wushan Town, Dada County, Fujian ProvinceOscar v. Van Overeem.
- Patricia Youngblood Reyhan, A Chaotic Palette: Conflict of Laws in Litigation between Original Owners and Good-Faith Purchasers of Stolen Art, 50 DUKE L.J. 955 (2001).
- U.S. v. McClain, 545 F.2d 988 ( 5th Cir.1977); 593 F. 2d 658 (5th Cir.1979).
- Li, X., & Peng L., (2021), Outline of the Chinese archaeological legal system, National Cultural Heritage Administration, visited on 25 July 2023, http://www.ncha.gov.cn/art/2021/7/9/art_2463_169934.html,
- Zhengxin Huo, 2008, A Battle over the Chinese Cultural Treasure Lost Overseas ----to be decided by Private International Law? Notes, China University of Political Science and Law. https://conflictoflaws.net/News/2018/04/A-Battle-over-the-Chinese-Culture-Treasure-Lost-Overseas.pdf.
- Xiuqin, Z. (2001). Emperor Taizong and his six horses. Orientations (Hong Kong), 32(2), 40-46.
- Sheker, W., (2017) A Chinese Museum demands the return of ancient artifacts from the Penn Museum, The Daily Pennsylvanian, visited on 25 July 2023. https://www.thedp.com/article/2017/02/a-chinese-museum-demands-return-of-artifiacts.
- Liu, A., (2019), Anonymous flyers call on Penn Museum to return two ‘stolen’ artifacts to China, The Daily Pennsylvanian, visited on 25 July 2023, https://www.thedp.com/article/2019/02/penn-museum-taizong-horses-controversy-upenn-philadelphia.
- Dolan, J. F. (1979). The UCC Framework: Conveyancing Principles and Property Interests. BUL Rev., 59, 811.
- Karen Theresa Burke, International Transfers of Stolen Cultural Property: Should Thieves Continue to Benefit from Domestic Laws Favoring Bona Fide Purchasers, 13 LOY.
- L.A. INT’l & COMP. L.J. 427 (1990); U.C.C. § 2-403(1); R. ANDERSON, supra note 141, at 584.
- U.C.C. § 2-403(1); R. ANDERSON, at 584.
- Supra note 45, at 445.
- U.C.C. § 2-403(1) states: A person with voidable title has power to transfer a good title to a good faith purchaser for value. When goods have been delivered under a transaction of purchase the purchaser has such power even though... (d) the delivery was procured through fraud punishable as larcenous under the criminal law..
- Supra note 45, at 445. “Void” here means that an instrument or transaction is nugatory and ineffectual so that nothing can cure it; voidable exists when an imperfection or defect can be cured by the act or confirmation of him who could take advantage of it.” See BLACK’S LAW DICTIONARY 812 (5th ed. 1979).
- The United States has become the world’s largest importer of works of art. Merryman, American Law and the International Trade in Art, in GENEVA WORKSHOP: INTERNATIONAL SALES OF WORKS OF ART 425 (1988),at426.
- Garro, The Recovery of Stolen Art Objects from Bona Fide Purchasers; Ibid at 503, 504.
- STATUTES OF LIMITATIONS FOR ALL 50 STATES, MATTHIESEN, WICKERT & LEHRER, S.C.
- Eg O’Keeffe v Snyder 83 NJ 478 (1980).
- 917 F 2d 278 (7th Cir 1990).
- Eg R Schwartz, The Limits of the Law: A Call for a New Attitude Toward Artwork Stolen During World War 11’(1998) 32 Columbia J Law & Social Problems 1.
- California Code, Code of Civil Procedure - CCP § 338(3)(A).
- Dalrymple v. Brown Annotate, 549 Pa. 217 (1997)701 A.2d 164.
- eg Menzel v List 267 NYS 2d 804 (SC 1966).