Research Article

Examining the Morality of the U.S. Atomic Bombings: Strategic Necessity or Controversial Decision?

Yuyang GaoGlenelg Country School*

* Corresponding author: [email protected]

Abstract

The morality of the two atomic bombings conducted by the United States on the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki has long raised contention among both strategists and the general public. This paper discusses the strategic context of World War II’s Pacific theater and proposes that despite the unprecedented “cruelty” casted on Hiroshima and Nagasaki by atomic weapons, the bombs were dropped out of the strategic necessity to bring a swift end to the war. By reviewing the diaries of key commanders, the U.S. Army’s reports and forecasts of a land invasion of Japan, and account of Japanese resilience and unfathomable refusal to surrender under conventional circumstances, this study demonstrates that by forcing an early Japanese surrender, the atomic attacks obviated a land invasion of Japan, which would have inflicted much heavier casualties and thus provide the moral underpinnings of the atomic weapon attacks.

Keywords: morality; U.S. atomic bombing; strategic necessity; nuclear controversy
Published: November 20, 2023
DOI: 10.54254/2753-7064/13/20230247
Volume: CHR Vol.13
pp. 95-99
Download PDF

References

  1. Giangreco, D.M. (1997) “Casualty Projection for the U.S. Invasion of Japan, 1945-1946: Planning and Policy Implications.” Journal of Military History. 61: 521-82.
  2. Bernstein, Barton J. (1995) “The Atomic Bombings Reconsidered”. Foreign Affairs, Vol. 74. No.1 pp 135-52.
  3. United States Strategic Bombing Survey, Summary Report: Pacific War (1946). Washington Post, January 28 1947.
  4. Wilson, Ward (2013). “The Bomb Didn’t Beat Japan…Stalin Did.” Foreignpolicy.com. Retrieved December 3 2019. https://foreignpolicy.com/2013/05/30/the-bomb-didn’t beat-japan-stalin-did/
  5. Roberts, Michael Lee (2005). “Ghost of a Nation: Totalitarian Spirit and Literary Mind of WWII Germany and Japan.” University of California, Berkeley.
  6. Stimson, Henry L (1947). “The Decision to Use the Atomic Bomb”. The Infantry Journal. Vol 60. No. 3, pp 35-41.
  7. Office of the Historian, Bureau of Public Affairs, United States Department of State. (n.d.). Foreign relations of the United States diplomatic papers: The Conference of Berlin (The Potsdam Conference), 1945, vol. II, p. 1382.
  8. Kawai, K. (1950). Mokusatsu, Japan’s Response to the Potsdam Declaration. Pacific Historical Review, 19(4), 409-414. doi:10.2307/3635822
  9. Oppenheimer, J. Robert (1945). “Recommendations on the Immediate Use of Nuclear Weapons.” https://nsarchive2.gwu.edu//nukevault/ebb525-The-Atomic-Bomb-and the-End-of-World-War-II/documents/025.pdf