A Relevance Theoretical Approach to Translators’ Subjectivity in Subtitle Translation
Abstract
While translation is always indispensable in international communication and exchange, the value of translators always seems to be underestimated. As an intermediary between the source and target language, translators can and should play their subjectivity in the translation practice. The translators’ subjectivity can be further interpreted from a relevance theoretical approach. This theory believes that translators are responsible for leading the way of comprehension of the audience by building a most identical cognitive environment and avoiding misunderstanding. Translators also play the main role in the two ostensive-inferential communication processes between the author and the translator and between the translator and the audience. Specifically, this paper uses the relevance theory as a foundation to analyze how translators’ subjectivity is manifested in subtitle translation. It picks out three examples from the lines of a popular American sitcom and finds out that translators do use amplification, conversion, and other strategies to make the ostension in the target language more acceptable for the Chinese audience. From the theoretical basis, the author also gives suggestions for optimizing the translation to retain the same comic effect.
References
- Hu Miao (2005). The Subjectivity of the Translator from the Perspective of Relevance Theory. Shanghai International Studies University. Master’s thesis
- Dan Sperber and Deirdre Wilson (1986). Relevance: Communication and Cognition. Oxford: Blackwell
- H.P. Grice (1975). Logic and Conversation. Syntax and semantics 3: Speech arts. pp. 41-58
- Ernst-August Gutt (1991). Translation and Relevance: Cognition and Context. Oxford: Blackwell
- Deirdre Wilson and Dan Sperber (2002). Relevance Theory. UCL Psychology and Language Sciences
- Francisco Yus. (2016). Humour and Relevance. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
- Susan H. Foster-Cohen (2004). Relevance Theory, Action Theory, and second language communication strategies. Second Language Research. 20,3: 289-302
- Philip W. Goodwin (2013). Translating the English Bible: From Relevance to Deconstruction. The Lutterworth Press.
- Gene L. Green (2010). Relevance Theory and Theological Interpretation: Thoughts on Metarepresentation. Journal of Theological Interpretation. 4,1: 75–90.
- Ran Yongping (2002). The Development and Application of Relevance Theory. Journal of the Guangdong University of Foreign Studies. (1):12-17
- Zhao Yan, Xiang Mingyou (2018). Exploring the Frontiers of Relevance Theory. Modern Foreign Languages. 41,1: 130-140
- Bu Aiping (2012). On the Translation of Chinese-English Aphorism Based on Relevance Theory. Shanghai Journal of Translators. 1: 70-73
- Wangting, Zhang Tian (2017). The application and development of relevance theory in the translation of tea. Tea in Fujian. 39(12):273-274
- Ghassemiazghandi, M, Tengku-Sepora, TM (2020). Translation Strategies of Humor in Subtitling. Pertanika Journal of Social Science and Humanities. 28,2: 939-955
- Horbacauskiene, J, Kasperaviciene, R, Petroniene, S (2016). Issues of culture specific item translation in subtitling. Meaning in Translation: Illusion of Precision. 231: 223-228
- Pedersen Jan (2018). How metaphors are rendered in subtitles. Target – International Journal of Translation Studies. 29,3: 416-439
- Bywood Lindsay, Georgakopoulou Panayota, Etchegoyhen Thierry (2017). Embracing the threat: machine translation as a solution for subtitling. Perspectives – Studies in Translation Theory and Practice. 25,3: 492-508
- Łukasz Bogucki (2004). The Constraint of Relevance in Subtitling. The Journal of Specialised Translation.
- Zhang Lijun (2013). Research of the translation of movie subtitles from the perspective of relevance theory. Film Literature. 16: 162-163