Difference of Parasocial Relationships Between China and Korea Under Various Social and Cultural Backgrounds
Abstract
The entertainment industry has reached a high level of maturity worldwide, with each country boasting its unique system and approach. Consequently, the nature of parasocial relationships between celebrities and fans varies significantly due to diverse cultural and social backgrounds. Notably, in Asia, both China and Korea experienced a similar period of development in the entertainment industry, yet they have diverged into distinct paths. Understanding the intricacies of parasocial relationships within these cultural and social contexts is significant as it provides valuable insights into the dynamics of celebrity-fan interactions. This paper aims to explore and compare the dynamics of parasocial relationships in the Chinese and Korean entertainment industries, with a particular focus on the influence of cultural and societal factors. To identify and examine the key factors that shape the behaviors in parasocial relationships, this paper compares in two influential factors: companionship and social gratification. There is a more thorough system of the entertainment industry, and the Korean government supports the development of entertainment rather than control a lot in China. It is within the realm of these factors that the behaviors of individuals engaged in parasocial relationships, both on the side of celebrities and fans, are significantly impacted. By delving into the disparities between Chinese and Korean entertainment industries, this paper aims to contribute to a broader understanding of the factors that shape parasocial relationships and shed light on the cultural nuances that influence these phenomena.
References
- Lieberman, A., & Schroeder, J. (2020). Two social lives: How differences between online and offline interaction influence social outcomes. Current Opinion in Psychology, 31, 16–21.
- Kim, J., Kim, J., & Yang, H. (2019). Loneliness and the use of social media to follow celebrities: A moderating role of social presence. The Social Science Journal, 56(1), 21–29.
- National Radio and Television Administration.( 2021)Network short video content review standard rules. Retrieved from: http://www.nrta.gov.cn/art/2021/12/15/art_110_59299.html
- Özbay, B. (2019). The relationship between Parasocial Theory and Brand Placement. Etkileşim, 2(4), 116–128.
- Yi, J. (2022). Supplemental material for female-oriented dating sims in China: Players’ parasocial relationships, gender attitudes, and romantic beliefs. Psychology of Popular Media, 58–68.
- Hudders, L., & Lou, C. (2022). The rosy world of influencer marketing? its bright and dark sides, and future research recommendations. International Journal of Advertising, 42(1), 151–161.
- Cheah, I., Liang, J., & Phau, I. (2018). Idolizing “My love from the star”: Idol attachment and fanaticism of luxury brands. Psychology & Marketing, 36(2), 120–137.
- Wei, X., Chen, H., Ramirez, A., Jeon, Y., & Sun, Y. (2022). Influencers as endorsers and followers as consumers: Exploring the role of parasocial relationship, congruence, and followers’ identifications on consumer–brand engagement. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 22(3), 269–288.
- Tukachinsky, R., Walter, N., & Saucier, C. J. (2020). Antecedents and effects of parasocial relationships: A meta-analysis. Journal of Communication, 70(6), 868–894.
- Xia, G., Qin, Z., & Hu, J. (2021). Literature review of celebrity worship. Proceedings of the Fifteenth International Conference on Management Science and Engineering Management, vol 78, 715–723.
- Beaty, L. S. (2021). “it’s Love Island, not friend island”: Authenticity and surveillance in reality TV, a literature review and content analysis20. Western CEDAR. https://cedar.wwu.edu/wwu_honors/456/