Communications in Humanities Research ISSN: 2753-7072
Home> Volumes> Volume CHR Vol.9> Article
Research Article

Application of Museum Curriculum Resources in the Cultivation of Historical Materialism Literacy in Middle Schools: Based on the Promulgation of China's New Curriculum Standards

Shuxia WangEast China Normal University*

* Corresponding author: [email protected]

Abstract

Historical materialism literacy is one of the five core literacy in Chinese middle school history courses’ curriculum objectives. To cultivate students’ historical materialism, studying how to apply museum curriculum resources to historical materialism has become essential. This study aims to discuss the meaning, significance, and strategies for using museum curriculum resources to achieve historical materialism. Regarding the connotation, the application of museum curriculum resources in middle school to cultivate historical materialism refers to utilizing museum resources related to the curriculum to help students develop scientific historical perspectives and methodologies. In terms of value, the implementation of museum curriculum resources in middle school to foster historical materialism can advance the professional development of teachers and enhance students’ knowledge and critical thinking skills. Concerning strategy, promoting the use of museum curriculum resources in historical materialism requires focusing on four aspects: curriculum objectives, content, methodology, and evaluation.

Keywords: middle school history; museum curriculum resources; historical materialism literacy; new curriculum standards
Published: October 31, 2023
DOI: 10.54254/2753-7064/9/20231208
Volume: CHR Vol.9
pp. 282-289
Download PDF

References

  1. Ministry of Education. (2022). The 2022 edition of the Compulsory Education History Curriculum Standards.
  2. State Council. (2019). Notice of The State Council on Strengthening the Protection of Cultural Heritage.
  3. Deng, J. (2019). Make Full Use of Museum Resources to Cultivate the Core Literacy of Youth History. Journal of Educational Development Research, 9, 28-32.
  4. Luo, X. (2018). The Effective Use of Digital Museum in High School History Teaching. Journal of Educational Development Research, 8, 66-71.
  5. Xu, L. (2020). Several questions about the core literacy of the history course. Journal of Educational Development Research, 10, 22-26.
  6. Engels, M.A. (1845). The German Ideology.
  7. Chen, H. (2018). Re-understand the High School History Teaching under The Guidance of Historical Materialism. Journal of Educational Development Research, 8, 36-40.
  8. Li, J. (2019). The Study of Exploration and Utilization of Museum Curriculum Resources. Journal of Educational Development Research, 9, 49-53.
  9. Zhu, X. (2018). Research on teacher professional development theory. Journal of Educational Development Research, 8, 11-15.
  10. Chang, H. & Du, J. (2019). Rational Thinking of the Construction of Teachers’ Professional Knowledge in the New Era. Journal of Educational Development Research, 9, 7-10.
  11. Wu, Z. (n.d.). Teachers’ Professional Competence Preparation and Effective Teaching Method for Teacher Education Curriculum.
  12. Yu, G. (n.d.). Teachers’ Belief and Its Significance to Teacher Training.
  13. Yan, M. (n.d.). Research on Cultivation of Critical Thinking Ability in High School History Teaching.
  14. Lou, W. (n.d.). The Relationship Between Critical Thinking and the Core Literacy of the History Course.
  15. Tyler, R. W. (2013). Basic Principles of Curriculum and Instruction.
  16. Twelve Key Normal Universities in China. (n.d.). Fundamentals of Pedagogy.
  17. Ministry of Education of the People’s Republic of China. (2011). History Curriculum Standards for Regular High Schools.
  18. Guo, W., & Wang, D. (2014). Pedagogy (Seventh Edition).
  19. Zhao, J. (n.d.). Deep Interpretation for the Principle of the Economics Basis Determining the Superstructure: The Explanations of Three Chapters of the “Theory of Violence” in Anti-Duhring.
  20. Amstelveen, R. (2013). Flipping a College Mathematics Classroom: An Action Research Project.
  21. Duch, B., Gron, S., & Allen, D. (2001). The power of problem-based learning. Stylus Publishing, LLC.
  22. Zhang, G., & Nunan, D. (2013). Using the context, input, process, and product evaluation model (CIPP) as a comprehensive framework to guide the planning, implementation, and assessment of service-learning programs. Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement, 17(3), 123-152.
  23. Dizon, A. G. (2015). Historical development of CIPP as a curriculum evaluation model. International Journal of Education and Research, 3(3), 415-424.
  24. Sun, J., & Mu, B. (2019). Research on the evaluation index system of “Qingma Project” based on CIPP model. Journal of Shandong University of Technology (Social Sciences), 35(6), 116-122.
  25. Wang, J., & Xu, X. (2019). The construction of the comprehensive evaluation index system for curriculum ideological and political education in colleges and universities: based on the theoretical framework of the CIPP evaluation model. Journal of Higher Education, 40(6), 104-113.