Research Article

The Error Analysis of De Structures: A Corpus-based Research

Shuang DingSouth China Agricultural University*

* Corresponding author: [email protected]

Abstract

This article analyzes the errors in de structures produced by learners studying Chinese as a second language based on the Global Chinese Interlanguage Corpus. The research is hoped to open up a new vision for error analysis of de structures with methods of corpus linguistics and provide some empirical evidence that can be used to adjust the teaching of Chinese grammar to make it more problem-oriented. The article begins with a brief review of relevant studies and an explicit definition of the de structure. Data used in the article all come from the Global Chinese Interlanguage Corpus, which has been sifted carefully to make them better adapted to the research objective. Errors in de structures are categorized into five different types based on the ways surface structures are altered. The characteristics of each error type are given by the description and correction of example sentences. Two mechanisms are given as the possible explanation for the roots of errors in de structures: L1 transfer and overgeneralization. The contrastive analysis between Korean, English and Chinese explains the occurrence of serval types of errors, and some erroneous sentences created by CSL learners also confirm the existence of overgeneralization.

Keywords: error analysis; corpus linguistics; interlanguage
Published: October 31, 2023
DOI: 10.54254/2753-7064/9/20231181
Volume: CHR Vol.9
pp. 180-188
Download PDF

References

  1. Dulay, H., Burt, M. and Krashen, S.D. (1982). Language Two. New York: Oxford University Press.
  2. James, C. (2013). Errors in Language Learning and Use: Exploring Error Analysis. New York: Routledge.
  3. Zhu, D. X. (1961). On De. [Shuo De]. Studies of the Chinese Language, 12, 34-37.
  4. Chao, Y. R. (2011). A Grammar of Spoken Chinese. Beijing: The Commercial Press.
  5. Huang, B. R., & Liao, X. D. (2011). Contemporary Chinese Language. [Xiandai Hanyu]. Beijing: Higher Education Press.
  6. Zhang, B. L., Cui, X. L. (2022). Features and Functions of Global Chinese Interlanguage Corpus. Chinese Teaching in the World, 1, 90-100.
  7. Liu, K. Z. (2015). Multi-angle Analysis of the De-Phrases on the Base of Corpus. Guangxi Normal University.
  8. Chen, Y. J., Sousa, H., Wang, J., Ni, X. X., Li, X. P., Chen, W. R., Chappell, H. (2014) Leipzig Glossing Rules and Its Application in the Annotations of Chinese Grammar. Dialect, 1, 1-13.
  9. Lü, S. X. (1980). Eight Hundred Words in Modern Chinese. [Xiandai Hanyu Babai Ci]. Beijing: The Commercial Press.
  10. Chuang, F. Y., & Nesi, H. (2006). An analysis of formal errors in a corpus of L2 English produced by Chinese students. Corpora, 2, 251-271.
  11. Hammerly, H. (1991). Fluency and Accuracy. Bristol: The Longdunn Press.
  12. Wang, H. (2016). The Comparison of De Structure of Chinese and Ged structure of Korean. Eastern Forum, 4, 112-116.
  13. Yip, V. (1995). Interlanguage and Learnability: From Chinese to English. Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.