Communications in Humanities Research ISSN: 2753-7072
Home> Volumes> Volume CHR Vol.8> Article
Research Article

A Contrastive Study of English and Mandarin Vowel Systems and Its Implications for TESOL

Chen YuUniversity of International Relations*

* Corresponding author: [email protected]

Abstract

In recent decades, due to the prevailing contrastive analysis, substantial detailed research has been done on the comparison of English and Mandarin vowel systems. Nonetheless, few researchers have ventured into the analysis of its implications for teaching English to speakers of other languages (TESOL). This paper functions to illuminate the particular challenges that the differences between the two systems are likely to present to Mandarin English learners of English, and to propose feasible solutions for educators and second-language learners to overcome these challenges. Through a thorough contrastive analysis of English and Mandarin vowel systems, this paper draws the conclusion that both the similarities and differences can be enormous hindrances for Chinese English learners. The paper also proposes corresponding solutions for TESOL, including attaching importance to the contrast of English and Mandarin vowel systems in classes and utilizing various educational technologies. Having been aware of the countermeasures, students will understand how to pronounce English vowels accurately and authentically, and the teacher will have a more precise map in TESOL.

Keywords: English; Mandarin; vowel system; TESOL
Published: October 31, 2023
DOI: 10.54254/2753-7064/8/20230990
Volume: CHR Vol.8
pp. 160-165
Download PDF

References

  1. Jia, Huilin. (2017). Analysis on Language Transfer in English Teaching. Advances in Education Research, 97, 98-102.
  2. Wang, Li. (1985). Mr. Wang’s Speech at the Plenary Meeting. Language Teaching and Linguistic Studies, 04, 4-5.
  3. George Yule. (2000). The study of Language. Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press. 48.
  4. Zhang, Jinsheng. (2002). A Comparative Study of English and Chinese Vowels and Its Pedagogical Significance. Journal of PLA University of Foreign Language, 25(01), 56-59.
  5. International Phonetic Association. (2005). IPA: vowels. https://www.internationalphoneticassociation.org/content/ipa-vowels.
  6. Li Lei. (2010). A Comparison of Chinese and English vowel systems and Their Effect on Teaching. Modern Communication, 298(11), 37+36.
  7. Helen Wong. (2015). Outline of the Mandarin Phonemic System. WORD, 9(3), 268-276.
  8. Liu, Xiaoluan., &Tian, Xing. (2018). The functional relations among motor-based prediction, sensory goals and feedback in learning non-native speech sounds: Evidence from adult Mandarin Chinese speakers with an auditory feedback masking paradigm. SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 8, 1-13.
  9. Pang, Haifen. (2016). A Contrastive Study of Phonological Systems between English and Mandarin Chinese. Inner Mongolia University, 13.
  10. Chen, Ying. (2004). A Contrastive Analysis of Rhythm in English and Chinese. Journal of Xi’an International Studies University, 2004(02), 1-4.
  11. Wang, Shuyue. (2020). The Influence of Negative Transfer of Native Language on English Phonetic Learning of College Students and its Countermeasures. English on Campus, 516(24), 26-27.
  12. Wang, Jianqin. (2009). The Study of Second Language Acquisition. The Commercial Press. 55.
  13. Lu, Feng. (2006). The “Chinese-flavored English” Caused by the Difference of English and Chinese Phonetic Systems and its Countermeasures. College English (Academic Edition), 2006(02), 3-7.
  14. Sun, Jianying. (2018). An Empirical Study on the Effectiveness of Speech Visualization Software Praat Assisting English Phonetic Teaching: Based on the Contrast between English and Chinese Monophthongs. Jiangsu University, 40.
  15. Gan, Qiao. (2017). An Empirical Study of English Phonetic Teaching based on Praat. Chinese Journal of ICT in Education, 391(04), 79-83.