Communications in Humanities Research ISSN: 2753-7072
Home> Volumes> Volume CHR Vol.8> Article
Research Article

The Formalism Issue of Catholic Iconography in China

Zhen LinChina Academy of Art*

* Corresponding author: [email protected]

Abstract

During the Republican period in China, the Catholic Church gradually developed and grew in China and made attempts to localize itself in different fields, one of which was the promotion of localized Catholic icon painting in the field of art. Due to the problem of divergence between Chinese and Western cultures and styles, formalistic expressions of these paintings emerged. As a representative practice of Catholic painting in China, Beiping Fu Jen Catholic University, with Chinese painting style as its main focus and Western style as its auxiliary, consciously innovated the expression of Catholic icon painting in China, however, in the expression of content and selection of subject matter, excessive emphasis was placed on Chinese visual language to cater to the tastes of Chinese audiences, and as the edifying function of Catholic painting failed to be exercised to a certain extent. There is still a certain degree of formalism. The development of Catholic painting in China needs to find a balance between the spirit of doctrine and Chinese visual culture, integrate Catholic aesthetics into the Chinese painting tradition, and create a new form of painting language, rather than the migration and appropriation of visual symbols.

Keywords: Catholic iconography; formalism; east-west art exchange; religious indigenization
Published: October 31, 2023
DOI: 10.54254/2753-7064/8/20230985
Volume: CHR Vol.8
pp. 131-136
Download PDF

References

  1. Changping, X. (2003). From the” Maximum Illud”encyclical on the Localization of the Catholic Church in China, Zhongguo Minzu Bao.
  2. Zhixin, W. (1925). Discussion on the Church of the True Colors in China, Qingnian Jinbu, No.79, pp. 15-16.
  3. Costantini, C. (1958). Chinese Catholic Fine Arts, Taizhong: Guangqi Publishing House, p.12.
  4. Sandel, B. (1997). Patterns of Intention, p. 168. China Academy of Art Press.
  5. The Draft of the Declaration of the Founding of Beijing University by St. Benedict in the United States, in Fang Hao (1972): Continuation of the Collected Works of Mr. Ma Xiangbo (Liang), Taibei: Wenhai Publishing House, pp. 70-80.
  6. Zhao, X. (2014). Rejuvenation after encounters between different artistic forms: a synopsis of studies of indigenization of Christian art in China. Journal of Modern Chinese History, 8(2), pp.258-271.
  7. Swerts, L., & De Ridder, K. (2002). Mon Van Genechten (1903-1974): Flemish Missionary and Chinese Painter: Inculturation of Chinese Christian Art (No. 11). Leuven University Press.
  8. Laufer, B. (1910). Christian art in China (Vol. 8). Reichdruckerei.
  9. Lawton, M. S. (1995). A unique style in China: Chinese Christian painting in Beijing. Monumenta serica, 43(1), 469-489.
  10. Küster, V. (2015). Translating Religious Symbol Systems: Some Preliminary Remarks on Christian Art in China. In Translating Religion (pp. 149-180). Routledge.
  11. Jinglei, H. (2019), Study on the Localization of Chinese Catholic Painting Art, China Academy of Art,pp.88-89.
  12. Grießmayer, S., Mersmann, B., & Schneider, A. (2009). Spreading the word with ink and brush–Chinese Christian images. Transmission image: Visual translation and cultural agency, 38-54.
  13. Weimin, G. (2005), History of Christian religious art in modern China, Shanghai: Shanghai Bookstore Publishing House, p.154.