Communications in Humanities Research ISSN: 2753-7072
Home> Volumes> Volume CHR Vol.7> Article
Research Article

Wash Away Immorality and Double Standards—Psychological Mechanisms by Which Cleansing Affects Moral Judgment under Different Subjects

Zhang JunpengBeijing Normal University Zhang ZheyuanBeijing Normal University* Yan HaoyinBeijing Normal University

* Corresponding author: [email protected]

Abstract

Embodied cognitive and conceptual metaphor theories state that physical cleansing can influence people’s moral judgments. However, the mechanism of cleansing affecting moral judgment is still not clear. Therefore, this research introduced the moral subject as a moderator of the process of cleansing affecting moral judgment and the moral self-image as a mediator to reveal the psychological mechanism by which physical cleansing affects moral judgment (“Macbeth effect”). Study 1 used the method of reading a third-person story to initiate a sense of immorality, washing hands with hand sanitizers for cleansing, to explore the moral judgment impact on different personal stories; Study 2 used the method of recalling of own immoral events to initiate immoral feelings, washing hands directly for cleansing. Both two studies failed to validate embodied cleaning effect. The findings suggest that physical cleansing does not affect moral judgment, nor does it affect the moral self-image, and cannot explore the moderating role of moral subject.

Keywords: embodied metaphor; physical cleansing; embodied morality; moral judgment; moral self-image
Published: October 31, 2023
DOI: 10.54254/2753-7064/7/20230884
Volume: CHR Vol.7
pp. 201-212
Download PDF

References

  1. Yin, R., Su, D.Q. and Ye, H.S. (2013). Conceptual Metaphor Theory in Embodied Cognition Perspective. Advances in Psychological Science, 2, 220–234.
  2. Ye, H.Y. and Zhang, F.H. (2015). Embodiment in Moral Judgment. Advances in Psychological Science, 23(8), 1480–1488. https://doi.org/10.3724/SP.J.1042.2015.01480
  3. Jordan, J., Mullen, E. and Murnighan, J. K. (2011). Striving for the moral self: The effects of recalling past moral actions on future moral behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37(5), 701–713. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167211400208
  4. West, C. and Zhong, C.B. (2015). Moral cleansing. Morality and Ethics, 6, 221–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2015.09.022
  5. Landau, M. J., Meier, B. P. and Keefer, L. A. (2010). A metaphor-enriched social cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 136(6), 1045–1067. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020970
  6. Lee, S. W. S. and Schwarz, N. (2011). Wiping the slate clean: Psychological consequences of physical cleansing. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20(5), 307-311. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0963721411422694
  7. Zhong, C. and Liljenquist, K. (2006). Washing Away Your Sins: Threatened Morality and Physical Cleansing. Science, 313(5792), 1451-1452. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1130726
  8. Schnall, S., Benton, J. and Harvey, S. (2008). With a clean conscience: Cleanliness reduces the severity of moral judgments. Psychological Science, 19(12), 1219–1222. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02227.x
  9. Zhong, C.B., Strejcek, B. and Sivanathan, N. (2010). A clean self can render harsh moral judgment. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46(5), 859–862. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2010.04.003
  10. Ye, H.S. (2010). Embodied Cognition: A New Approach in Cognitive Psychology. Advances in Psychological Science, 18(5), 705–710.
  11. Lakoff, G. and Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  12. Lakoff, G. and Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind & its challenge to Western thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  13. Inagaki, T. K. and Eisenberger, N. I. (2013). Shared neural mechanisms underlying social warmth and physical warmth. Psychological Science, 24(11), 2272-2280. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0956797613492773
  14. Zhong, C. and Leonardelli, G. J. (2008). Cold and Lonely: Does Social Exclusion Literally Feel Cold? Psychological Science, 19(9), 838-842. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02165.x
  15. Haidt, J. and Joseph, C. (2004). Intuitive ethics: How innately prepared intuitions generate culturally variable virtues. Daedalus, 133(4), 55–66. https://doi.org/10.1162/0011526042365555\
  16. Su, Y.J. and Sun, F.F. (2014). A Meta-Analysis of the Moral Embodied Cognition. Journal of East China Normal University (Educational Sciences), 32(2), 88–96. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1000-5560.2014.02.013
  17. Riis, J., Simmons, J. P. and Goodwin, G. P. (2008). Preferences for enhancement pharmaceuticals: The reluctance to enhance fundamental traits. Journal of Consumer Research, 35(3), 495-508. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/588746
  18. Schnall, S., Haidt, J., Clore, G. L. and Jordan, A. H. (2008). Disgust as Embodied Moral Judgment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34(8), 1096–1109. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167208317771
  19. Blasi, A. (2004). Moral Functioning: Moral Understanding and Personality. In Moral development, self, and identity. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
  20. Gilchrist, P. T. and Schnall, S. (2018). The paradox of moral cleansing: When physical cleansing leads to increased contamination concerns. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 61, 38–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbtep.2018.06.002
  21. Tobia, K. P. (2015). The effects of cleanliness and disgust on moral judgment. Philosophical Psychology, 28(4), 556-568. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09515089.2013.877386
  22. Ward, S. J. and King, L. A. (2018). Individual differences in reliance on intuition predict harsher moral judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 114(5), 825-849. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000153
  23. Denton, K. and Krebs, D. (1990). From the scene to the crime: The effect of alcohol and social context on moral judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59(2), 242-248. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.59.2.242
  24. Earp, B. D., Everett, J. A. C., Madva, E. N. and Hamlin, J. K. (2014). Out, damned spot: can the “Macbeth Effect” be replicated? Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 36(1), 91–98. https://doi.org/10.1080/01973533.2013.856792
  25. Qiao, J.Z. and Wang, B. (2003). An Overview on Hoffman’s Virtual Guilt Theory. Psychological Exploration, 23(3), 25–28. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1003-5184.2003.03.006
  26. Siev, J., Zuckerman, S. E. and Siev, J. J. (2018). The Relationship Between Immorality and Cleansing. Social Psychology, 49(5), 303–309. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000349
  27. Aquino, K. and Reed, A. (2002). The self-importance of moral identity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(6), 1423–1440. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.83.6.1423
  28. Monin, B. and Jordan, A. H. (2009). The dynamic moral self: A social psychological perspective. In D. Narvaez and D. K. Lapsley (Eds.), Personality, identity, and character: Explorations in moral psychology (pp. 341-354, Chapter viii, 456 Pages). Cambridge University Press, New York, NY. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511627125.016
  29. Conway, P. and Peetz, J. (2012). When does feeling moral actually make you a better person? conceptual abstraction moderates whether past moral deeds motivate consistency or compensatory behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38(7), 907. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0146167212442394
  30. Malle, B. (2021). Moral Judgments. Annual Review of Psychology, 72, 293–318. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-072220-104358
  31. Zeng, Z.X., Tu, Z.M. and Lv, Y.H. (1992). Lun Daode Zhijve [On Moral Perception]. Jianghan Tribune, 8, 29–34.
  32. Bargh, J. A., Chen, M. and Burrows, L. (1996). Automaticity of social behavior: direct effects of trait construct and stereotype activation on action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(2), 230-244. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.71.2.230
  33. Doyen, S., Klein, O., Pichon, C. and Cleeremans, A. (2012). Behavioral priming: It’s all in the mind, but whose mind? PLoS ONE, 7(1), 7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0029081
  34. Stanley, David J and Spence, Jeffrey R. (2014). Expectations for Replications: Are Yours Realistic? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9(3), 305-318. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1745691614528518
  35. Goodwin, G. P., Piazza, J. and Rozin, P. (2014). Moral character predominates in person perception and evaluation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 106(1), 148–168. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034726
  36. Schaich Borg, J., Hynes, C., Van Horn, J., Grafton, S. and Sinnott-Armstrong, W. (2006). Consequences, action, and intention as factors in moral judgments: An FMRI investigation. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18(5), 803–817. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2006.18.5.803
  37. Morewedge, C. K. and Kahneman, D. (2010). Associative processes in intuitive judgment. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 14(10), 435-440. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2010.07.004