Communications in Humanities Research ISSN: 2753-7072
Home> Volumes> Volume CHR Vol.6> Article
Research Article

The Vagueness of Ordinary Language and Its Impact on the Pragmatic Turn

Shupin LiBeijing Foreign Studies University*

* Corresponding author: [email protected]

Abstract

The significant contribution of ordinary language to the pragmatic turn in analytic philosophy has received a great deal of attention from philosophers and linguists, but there is still a gap in the special study of the influence of ordinary language on the pragmatic turn from the perspective of its vagueness. On the basis of the fact that ideal language cannot portray the reality of some linguistic facts, this article compares and analyzes the differences between ideal language and ordinary language in terms of vagueness, and further argue that ordinary language cannot exist in the process of language use in isolation from the reality of the situation through three subdivisions of vagueness: roughness, ambiguity, and incompleteness. The vagueness creates the opportunities for language to be used in a way that is closely tied to the actual situation, dismantling the artificially shaped conditions of perfect use of the ideal language and redirecting the philosophers' attention to the concrete elaboration of language. In this manner, philosophy's concern of ordinary language use and the subjective experience of language users coincides with pragmatics and further drives philosophy to take a pragmatic turn.

Keywords: vagueness; ordinary language; pragmatic turn; language use
Published: September 14, 2023
DOI: 10.54254/2753-7064/6/20230356
Volume: CHR Vol.6
pp. 427-433
Download PDF

References

  1. Wei, B.H. (2006). Difference Between Common Language and Philosophical Language. Journal of Beijing University (Humanities and Social Sciences) (04), 44-49. doi:10.16255/j.cnki.11-5117c.2006.04.010.
  2. Wang, Y., Wang, T.Y.. (2022). The Latest Development of Speech Act Theory in Postmodernist Philosophy: Western Philosophy of Language Still in the Ascendant. Social Sciences Abroad (01), 169-176+200-201.
  3. Cai, S.S. (2006). Re-discussing the Linguistic Turn of Philosophy and Its Significance and the Development from Analytic Philosophy to Philosophy of Language. Academia in China (04), 20-39.
  4. Li, G.S. (2003). Why Language is so Important: Some Reflections on the "Linguistic Turn" in Western Philosophy. Academic Journal of Zhongzhou (01), 148-152.
  5. Chen, J.Y. (2013). Concise philosophy of language: Language Philosophy. China Renmin University Press Co. LTD
  6. Cui, J.F. (2010). The Language view in Wittgenstein's philosophy Master's degree thesis, Heilongjiang University). https://kns.cnki.net/KCMS/detail/detail.aspx?dbname=CMFD2010&filename=2010148278.nh
  7. Shen, X.S. (2016). The Expression of the Pragmatic Turn and its Role in Linguistic Breakthrough. Academia in China (02), 139-147.
  8. Cui, F.J. (2007). A Study of Pragmatics from the Perspective of Ordinary-language Philosophy. Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology (Social Science Edition) (06), 65-68. doi:10.19648/j.cnki.jhustss1980. 2007.06.012.
  9. Wittgenstein, L. (1996). Philosophical Studies. The Commercial Press.
  10. Zhong, M.Z. (2010). Later Wittgenstein Return to the Daily Language. Foreign Language and Literature (05), 42-46.
  11. Williamson, T. (2019). Vagueness. China Renmin University Press Co. LTD
  12. Liu, C. (2018). Wittgenstein and the Problem of Vagueness (Master's degree thesis, Wuhan University of Technology). https://kns.cnki.net/KCMS/detail/detail.aspx?dbname=CMFD201902&filename=1019831086.nh
  13. Qin, M. (2006). The Return from Ideal Language to Ordinary Language (Master's degree thesis, Heilongjiang University). https://kns.cnki.net/KCMS/detail/detail.aspx?dbname=CMFD0506&filename=2006139191.nh