Research Article

Confucian Discourse Being Formed: Transmutation of Bo Yi and Shu Qi Allegory in Early China

Qiusi LiCentral China Normal University*

* Corresponding author: [email protected]

Abstract

Through the process of sanctification over generations, Bo Yi and Shu Qi, the two adherents to Shang, have, to some extent, become the moral models in Chinese cultural memory. While their starvation to death for the sake of the Right Way has been extolled by non-imperial and imperial scholars, it must not be neglected that the account of Bo Yi and Shu Qi is naturally marked by an inescapable contradiction: their sage allegiance to the Shang Dynasty was, in fact, a very dismantling of the legitimacy of Zhou in the sense of “Heavenly Mandate” that the Zhou had constructed. Scholars of ancient China had shaped and presented the two as models for their times and future generations, but almost none of them showed direct interest in boldly discussing the contradiction. By focusing on how Chinese classics in an early stage dealt with the dilemma of judgment between the moral paragons and the legitimacy of an ideal era in accounts of the Bo Yi allegory, this paper demonstrates the changing process from the abstract and general narration of Confucius and Mencius to the comprehensive, paradoxical, and dialectical narration of Sima Qian, reflecting Confucianism’s progression in maturity in early China.

Keywords: ancient Chinese classics; Bo Yi; Shu Qi; Confucius; Mencius; Sima Qian
Published: September 14, 2023
DOI: 10.54254/2753-7064/6/20230277
Volume: CHR Vol.6
pp. 293-298
Download PDF

References

  1. Sun Chang, K.-i and Owen, S. (2010). The Cambridge History of Chinese Literature (Vol. 1). Cambridge University Press.
  2. Wang, C.H. (1988). From Ritual to Allegory: Seven Essays in Early Chinese Poetry. Hong Kong: The Chinese University Press.
  3. Legge, J. and Waltham, C. (1972). Shu Ching: Book of history. A modernized edition of the translations of James Legge. George Allen & Unwin Ltd.
  4. Owen, S. (1996): An Anthology of Chinese Literature: Beginnings to 1911. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.
  5. Zhu, X. (1983). Sishu Zhangju Jizhu. Beijing: Zhonghua Shuju.
  6. Xiao, Y. and Li, J. (2021). Mencius’ on Autocrat and Confucian Political Ethics. History of Chinese Philosophy, 121(05), 12-19.
  7. Durrant, W.S. (1995). The Cloudy Mirror: Tension and Conflict in the Writings of Sima Qian, New York: State University of New York Press.
  8. Legge, J. (1891). The Sacred Books of China: The Texts of Tâoism, 163-165. Clarendon Press.
  9. Liu, Y.M. (2015). A Preliminary Study on the Reason Why Boyi and Shuqi were Introduced to the Saints’ Altar. Journal of Hebei Normal University of Science & Technology (Social Science), 14(01), 51-55.
  10. Kern, M. (2022). Cultural memory and the epic in early Chinese literature: The Case of Qu Yuan and the Lisao. Journal of Chinese Literature and Culture, 9(1), 131–169. https://doi.org/10.1215/23290048-9681189.