Research Article

Luce Irigaray’s Body Theory and Film Rouge: Female Image of Courtesan Ruhua

Jiuqing FanFudan University*

* Corresponding author: [email protected]

Abstract

The representation of charming female bodies is a distinct characteristic of feminine movies directed by Guan Jinpeng. Rouge, one of his representative works, illustrates the hope and despair of a courtesan named Ruhua. Although several studies revealed the political metaphor of her body image, few researchers put emphasis on the female sentiment behind it. Therefore, by means of textual analysis, this study explores the life experience of Ruhua mirrored by her body image based on three theoretical perspectives proposed by Luce Irigaray in The Sex Which is Not One, including market value, sexual pleasure and class oppression of the female body. The research finding is that in Rouge, lens languages such as compositions, lights and clothes are conceived elaborately to depict Ruhua’s body feelings, which not only implies her disadvantaged position in terms of wealth, sex and power but also reflects her individual consciousness against her dominated body as she is craving for maintaining a relatively equal relationship with her lover. The body narrative in Rouge subverts traditional films made by other male directors that commodify the female body under the male gaze and sets an example for the future feminine movie of how the depiction of the female body destroys gender power.

Keywords: body theory; Rouge; Luce Irigaray
Published: September 14, 2023
DOI: 10.54254/2753-7064/6/20230167
Volume: CHR Vol.6
pp. 149-155
Download PDF

References

  1. Dai, J.H. (1994). Invisible women: Women in Contemporary Film and Women’s Film, Contemporary Cinema, 6, 37-45.
  2. Abbas, A. (1994). The New Hong Kong Cinema and the ‘Déjà Disparu’, Discourse, 16, 65–77.
  3. Cheung, E.M.K. (2010). On Spectral Mutations: The Ghostly City in The Secret, Rouge and Little Cheung. Hong Kong culture: word and image.
  4. Li, O.F., Wang, X.J. (1998). Two Hong Kong Movies: Parody and Fable, World Cinema, 4, 34-47.
  5. Tang, L.F. (2004). The Paradox of Self-Identity and Repellency, Jianghan Tribune, 11, 135-137.
  6. Ryan, M. (2006). Literary theory: A practical Introduction, Peking: Peking University Press.
  7. Liu, Y. (2015). Cultural conventions and meaning reconstruction of the female body: Butler and Irrigary‘s body writing, Foreign Literature, 4, 128-134+160.
  8. Irigaray, L. (1985). This sex Which is Not One. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
  9. Hirsh, E., Olson, G. A., Brulotte, G. (1995). Je-Luce Irigaray: A Meeting with Luce Irigaray. Hypatia, 10, 93–114.
  10. Liu, Y., Qiu X.J. Zhan, J.F. (2007). A theoretical reader in female identity. Wuhan: Wuhan University Press.
  11. De Beauvoir, S. (2011). The Second Sex. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
  12. Thompson, R. (2017). Grammar of the Shot. Peking: Beijing United Publishing Co., Ltd.
  13. Moi, T. (1992). Sexual / Textual Politics: Feminist Literary Theory. Jilin: Times Literature and Art Publishing House.
  14. Irigaray, L., Burke, C. (1980). When Our Lips Speak Together. Signs: Journal of Women in culture and Society, 6, 69–79.
  15. Travis, C. B., Meginnis, K. L., Bardari, K. M. (2000). Beauty, sexuality, and identity: The social control of women. In C. B. Travis & J. W. White (Eds.). American Psychological Association.
  16. Chow, R. (1993). A Souvenir of Love. Modern Chinese Literature, 7, 59–78.
  17. Liu, Y. (2013). The Gender Subject and the Ethics of Difference: An Interview with Luce Irigary. Literature & Art Studies, 6, 90-97.