Dark Desires and Consent: A Response to Morgan
Abstract
In the paper Dark Desires, Seiriol Morgan aims to argue against the claim that “universal participant consent is sufficient for the moral permissibility of a sexual act” which is largely accepted in contemporary western philosophy. This article examines Morgan's argument against such a claim and improves Morgan's two illustrative cases to better support his claim. It starts by clarifying the meanings of the terms "moral permissibility", "dark desires", and "consent" to make Morgan's argument easier to tackle with. Then, the strong and weak versions of Morgan's claim will be distinguished, and their plausibility will be examined. Finally, it concludes that (i) only the weak version succeeds, and (ii) Morgan succeeds in showing consent to be insufficient for the moral permissibility of any sexual act.
References
- Morgan, S. (2003). Dark desires. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 6(4), 377-410.
- Lemieux, R. (1980). Valmont, libertin amoureux ou homme à projet?. Romance Notes, 20(3), 349-354.
- De Laclos, P. C. (2012). Les liaisons dangereuses. Routledge.
- Mill, J. S. (2016). Utilitarianism. In Seven masterpieces of philosophy (pp. 337-383). Routledge.
- Moran, K. (2014). Delusions of virtue: Kant on self-conceit. Kantian Review, 19(3), 419-447.
- Russell, F. (2020). Kantian Self-Conceit and the Two Guises of Authority. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 50(2), 268-283.
- Wertheimer, A. (2003). Consent to sexual relations. Cambridge University Press.
- Dougherty, T. (2013). Sex, lies, and consent. Ethics, 123(4), 717-744.
- Miller, S.(2022). BDSM. Raja Halwani, Jacob M. Held, Natasha McKeever & Alan Soble (eds.), The Philosophy of Sex: Contemporary Readings, 8th edition. Lanham, Md.: Rowman & Littlefield.
- Fifty Shades of Grey. (2015). [Film] Directed by Sam Taylor-Johnson. United Kingdom: Universal Pictures.
- Dunkley, C. R., & Brotto, L. A. (2020). The role of consent in the context of BDSM. Sexual Abuse, 32(6), 657-678.