Research Article

A Comparative Study among Politics, Aesthetics, and Freedom

Yulin LiThe Chinese University of Hong Kong*

* Corresponding author: [email protected]

Abstract

With the current prevailing wave of nationalism and the rise of power politics, numerous uncertain factors have become the new background of international relations and political studies today. Compared to Francis Fukuyama’s verdict in 1992, “the end of history”, the claiming of “the return of the political” has occupied the contemporary, and constantly calling for new approaches to politics. It is in this way that the interdisciplinary studies between political philosophy and the multiform of arts are yielded. Through a comparative study of Jacques Rancière’s political aesthetics and Michel Foucault’s aesthetics of existence, this piece will make a tentative rethinking of the mutual immanence of aesthetics and the political, as well as the philosophical connotation of aesthetics/arts for liberation and freedom of the political, politics, and humanity.

Keywords: Jacques Rancière; political aesthetics; Michel Foucault
Published: September 14, 2023
DOI: 10.54254/2753-7064/5/20230369
Volume: CHR Vol.5
pp. 456-460
Download PDF

References

  1. Mouffe, C. (2005). The return of the political. Verso, 25.
  2. Benjamin, W. (1970). “The Author as Producer.” New Left review 62, 83–.
  3. Plato, and Benjamin Jowett (2012). The Republic. Trans. Benjamin Jowett. 2nd ed. Luton, Bedfordshire: Andrews UK Limited, 276-86.
  4. Rockhill, G. (2022). Interventions in Contemporary Thought : History, Politics, Aesthetics. Edinburgh University Press, 214.
  5. Adorno, Theodor W., Gretel. Adorno, et al (1997). Aesthetic Theory. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  6. Rancière, J. (1999). Disagreement : Politics and Philosophy. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 30, 29.
  7. Foucault, M. (1995). Discipline and Punish : the Birth of the Prison. 2nd Vintage Books ed. New York: Vintage Books, 222.
  8. Rancière, J. (2010). “The Aesthetics Heterotopia.” Philosophy today (Celina) 54.Supplement, 15.
  9. May, T., Benjamin Noys, and Saul Newman (2008). “Democracy, Anarchism and Radical Politics Today: An Interview with Jacques Ranciere.” Anarchist studies 16.2, 179.
  10. Foucault, M (1990). The History of Sexuality. London: Penguin, 25-7.
  11. Foucault, M. et al (1988). Technologies of the Self : a Seminar with Michel Foucault. London: Tavistock Publications, 15.
  12. Gauny, G., and Jacques. Rancière (2017). The plebeian philosopher. Paris: The Discovery/Maspero, 45-6.