Communications in Humanities Research ISSN: 2753-7072
Home> Volumes> Volume CHR Vol.126> Article
Research Article

When Standard Answers Become Shackles: The Impact of Social Media Experience Substitution on Individual Decision-Making Autonomy

Yihe Xiao*
Teensen Genesis School

* Corresponding author: [email protected]

Abstract

Individuals are now sharing their experiences through social media posts in order to make decisions during the digital media age. This practice offers convenient access to information but might hinder independent thinking and decision-making autonomy. Experience substitution is defined as people substituting their own trial-and-error process with others' experiences. Based on information dependency theory, social comparison theory, and the availability heuristic, this paper investigates how social media information dependency influences decision-making autonomy and if critical thinking acts as a buffer between them. Through a questionnaire survey among 21 social media users (aged 15 – 22), the research finds that over 85% of the respondents actively search for others' experiences prior to making decisions; and over 90% of the respondents feel self-doubt whenever they have different experiences than those portrayed in mainstream narratives on social media. These results verify the presence of the experience substitution phenomenon, and show that critical thinking buffers the negative impact of social media information dependency upon decision-making autonomy.

Keywords: Social media; Decision-making autonomy; Information dependency theory; Questionnaire
Published: November 10, 2026
DOI: 10.54254/2753-7064/2026.BJ38855
Volume: CHR Vol.126
pp. 172-177
Download PDF

References

  1. Chen, L., & Hu, Y. (2022). Short-form video platforms and social comparison: The mediating role of algorithmic recommendation.Computers in Human Behavior, 135, 107368.
  2. Wang, X., & Liu, Z. (2023). Social media information overload and decision fatigue among Chinese adolescents.Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 52(6), 1189–1201.
  3. Zhang, Y., & Chen, M. (2022). Information cocoons and critical thinking: A study of Chinese adolescents' social media use.Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 80, 101413.
  4. Ball-Rokeach, S. J., & DeFleur, M. L. (1976). A dependency model of mass-media effects.Communication Research, 3(1), 3–21.
  5. Zhao, L., et al. (2019). Online information seeking behavior and its impact on college students' learning autonomy.Library and Information Science Research, 41(2), 125–133.
  6. Sunstein, C. R. (2017).#Republic: Divided democracy in the age of social media. Princeton University Press.
  7. Schwarz, N. (2015). Metacognition. In M. Mikulincer, P. R. Shaver, E. Borgida, & J. A. Bargh (Eds.),APA handbook of personality and social psychology: Vol. 1. Attitudes and social cognition(pp. 203–229). American Psychological Association.
  8. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases.Science, 185(4157), 1124–1131.
  9. Bandura, A. (1977).Social learning theory. Prentice Hall.
  10. Facione, P. A. (1990).Critical thinking: A statement of expert consensus for purposes of educational assessment and instruction—The Delphi report. California Academic Press.
  11. Yang, F., Tang, J., Men, J., & Zheng, X. (2021). The influence of social media influencers on adolescent purchase intention.Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 63, 102683.
  12. Zhang, L. (2025). Social media information dependency and decision-making autonomy among Chinese youth.Journal of Digital Media and Society, 12(3), 215–230.