Communications in Humanities Research ISSN: 2753-7072
Home> Volumes> Volume CHR Vol.2> Article
Research Article

Analysis from Simplification to Interactivity in John Cage’s 4’33” and Philip Glass’s Metamorphosis Based on Jonathan D. Kramer’s Theory

Yutong ShenFinancial Management, Shanghai University of International Business and Economics, Shanghai, 201600, China*

* Corresponding author: [email protected]

Abstract

The postmodernist musical works reflect the uncertainty, fragmentation, irony, and carnival of postmodernism, and some of them also embody the characteristics of simplification and interactivity. In this paper, John Cage’s 4’33” and Philip Glass’s Metamorphosis will be compared and analyzed with Jonathan D. Kramer’s theoretical view, to research the simplification and interactivity of the reasons, as well as the musical and social significance. Simplification is one of the prerequisites of interactivity. The simplification of Glass’s Metamorphosis accounts for the simplification or even elimination of musical elements, but the emotions and meanings expressed in the works are not affected. It leaves a broader imagination, which is where the interactivity arises. Postmodernist music composers use simplification skills to resonate with listeners who the social environment and postmodernist values have influenced in their works. The “blank left” of postmodernist music works gives the audience reasonable space for integration, and the willingness of the postmodernist audience to actively participate in the work does not limit the work to unilateral output and complete acceptance by the other side. This interactivity also creates a broader range of possibilities.

Keywords: postmodernist music; Philip Glass; 4’33”; interactivity; Kramer
Published: February 28, 2023
DOI: 10.54254/2753-7064/2/2022577
Volume: CHR Vol.2
pp. 479-489
Download PDF

References

  1. Kramer, J.D. (1999). The Nature and Origins of Musical Postmodernism. Current Musicology, 66 : 7.
  2. Hassan, I. (1993). The Postmodern Turn: Essays in Postmodern Theory and Culture. Trans. Liu Xiangyu. Taipei: Shibao Culture Press.
  3. Nieman, M. (1974). Experimental Music: Cage and Beyond.
  4. Johnson, T. (1989). The Voice of New Music: New York City 1972-1982: a Collection of Articles Originally Published in the Village Voice.
  5. Hu, S. (2018). The Artistic Characteristics and Interpretation of Philip Glass’s Minimalist Style Piano Works “Metamorphosis one-five” [D]. Jiangxi: Jiangxi Normal University.
  6. Hu, Y. (2010). Indian philosophy and John Cage’s music creation. Huang Zhong (Journal of Wuhan Conservatory of Music), 2, 73-80. Retrieved from https://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/periodical/ChlQZXJpb2RpY2FsQ0hJTmV3UzIwMjIwNzE5EhRoei13aHl5eHl4YjIwMTAwMjAwORoIand5eHd6dG4%3D.
  7. Wang, S. (1989). On the Value Orientation and Aesthetic Effect of 4’33”. Huang Zhong: Journal of Wuhan Conservatory of Music, 2, 40-46. Retrieved from https://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/periodical/ChlQZXJpb2RpY2FsQ0hJTmV3UzIwMjIwNzE5EgoxMDAzMDA4NzczGghpYWVoaHVoOA%3D%3D.
  8. Duker, P. (2018). Review of Jonathan D. Kramer, Postmodern Music, Postmodern Listening (Bloomsbury, 2016). Gamut: Online Journal of the Music Theory Society of the Mid-Atlantic 8.1, 9. Retrieved from https://trace.tennessee.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1128&context=gamut.
  9. Pritchett, J. (2009). What silence taught John Cage: The story of 4’33”. The anarchy of silence: John Cage and experimental art, 166-177.
  10. Hong, T. (2018). A brief discussion on the “invisibility” of artwork -- Concept art. Fine Arts Overview, 2, 62-63. Retrieved from https://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/periodical/ChlQZXJpb2RpY2FsQ0hJTmV3UzIwMjIwNzE5Eg1tc2RnMjAxODAyMDE0GghpOXZ0NjNpcg%3D%3D.
  11. Gergen, K. (1992). The Saturated Self.