Ethical Risks and Normative Paths in Digital Communication in the AIGC Era
Abstract
The rapid rise of generative artificial intelligence (AIGC) has profoundly reshaped the technical foundation and ecological structure of digital communication. From the combined perspective of communication studies and technology ethics, this paper examines four shifts that AIGC has brought to digital communication: the intelligent upgrading of content production, the multimodal expansion of representational forms, the pluralistic restructuring of production subjects, and the turn toward a precise and personalized communication logic. However, viewed along four dimensions—the erosion of authenticity, the illusion of neutrality, the loss of boundaries, and the rupture of rights and responsibilities—digital communication in the AIGC era faces serious ethical risks, including the spread of false information, algorithmic bias and value skew, data security and privacy leakage, disputes over content ownership, and the weakening of media responsibility. This study argues that a normative path combining "institutional constraint, responsibility strengthening, ethical shaping, and literacy improvement" is needed, so as to keep a dynamic balance between technological innovation and ethical order and to promote the healthy development of the digital communication ecosystem.
References
- Yu, G., & Su, J. (2023). The communication revolution and media ecology under the wave of generative artificial intelligence: From ChatGPT to the future of comprehensive intelligence.Journal of Xinjiang Normal University (Edition of Philosophy and Social Sciences), 44(5), 81–90.
- Postman, N. (2007).Technopoly: The surrender of culture to technology(D. He, Trans.). Peking University Press. (Original work published 1992)
- McLuhan, M. (2000).Understanding media: The extensions of man(D. He, Trans.). The Commercial Press. (Original work published 1964)
- Peng, L. (2017).An introduction to network communication(4th ed.). China Renmin University Press.
- Peng, L. (2017). Better journalism or worse journalism? New challenges for the media industry in the age of artificial intelligence.China Publishing, (24), 3–8.
- Sunstein, C. R. (2008).Infotopia: How many minds produce knowledge(J. Bi, Trans.). Law Press China. (Original work published 2006)
- Beck, U. (2004).Risk society(B. He, Trans.). Yilin Press. (Original work published 1986)
- O'Neil, C. (2018).Weapons of math destruction(Q. Ma, Trans.). CITIC Press. (Original work published 2016)
- Cyberspace Administration of China, Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, & Ministry of Public Security. (2022). Provisions on the management of deep synthesis in internet information services. Issued December 11, 2022; effective January 10, 2023.
- Cyberspace Administration of China, National Development and Reform Commission, Ministry of Education, et al. (2023). Interim measures for the management of generative artificial intelligence services. Issued July 10, 2023; effective August 15, 2023.