Communications in Humanities Research ISSN: 2753-7072
Home> Volumes> Volume CHR Vol.123> Article
Research Article

Empathetic Expression and Public Response in Weibo Comments Following Youth Self-Disclosure

Zhiya Zheng*
Shenzhen College of International Education

* Corresponding author: [email protected]

Abstract

This study examined how different forms of empathetic-supportive expression in Weibo comments were associated with public responses to youth self-disclosure. The sample included 1,296 comments nested within 180 distress-related posts by users whose public self-presentation indicated an age or educational stage consistent with 14–19 years. Comments were multilabel-coded for six components: emotional validation, cognitive understanding, emotional care, action support, moral defense, and brief reassurance. Negative binomial models were used to predict comment likes and replies separately. Action support was positively associated with both likes and replies, whereas emotional validation and emotional care were associated primarily with replies. In addition, comments combining understanding-oriented expression with action support received more replies, but not more likes. These findings suggest that different supportive functions correspond to different forms of public interaction and that empathy should not be treated as a unitary category. Because the study is observational, the results reflect associations rather than causal effects.

Keywords: adolescent self-disclosure; empathetic expression; online social support; Weibo
Published: November 3, 2026
DOI: 10.54254/2753-7064/2026.BA38476
Volume: CHR Vol.123
pp. 152-168
Download PDF

References

  1. Nesi, J., Choukas-Bradley, S., & Prinstein, M. J. (2018). Transformation of adolescent peer relations in the social media context: Part 1—a theoretical framework and application to dyadic peer relationships.Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 21(3), 267–294. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10567-018-0261-x
  2. Nesi, J., & Prinstein, M. J. (2019). In search of likes: Longitudinal associations between adolescents' digital status seeking and health-risk behaviors.Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 48(5), 740–748. https://doi.org/10.1080/15374416.2018.1437733
  3. Sherman, L. E., Payton, A. A., Hernandez, L. M., Greenfield, P. M., & Dapretto, M. (2016). The power of the like in adolescence: Effects of peer influence on neural and behavioral responses to social media.Psychological Science, 27(7), 1027–1035. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797616645673
  4. Davis, M. H. (1983). Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44(1), 113–126. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.44.1.113
  5. Decety, J., & Jackson, P. L. (2004). The functional architecture of human empathy.Behavioral and Cognitive Neuroscience Reviews, 3(2), 71–100. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534582304267187
  6. Berger, J., & Milkman, K. L. (2012). What makes online content viral?Journal of Marketing Research, 49(2), 192–205. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmr.10.0353
  7. Oh, H. J., Ozkaya, E., & LaRose, R. (2014). How does online social networking enhance life satisfaction? The relationships among online supportive interaction, affect, perceived social support, sense of community, and life satisfaction.Computers in Human Behavior, 30, 69–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.07.053
  8. Bavelas, J. B., Coates, L., & Johnson, T. (2000). Listeners as co-narrators.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(6), 941–952. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.79.6.941
  9. Burke, M., & Kraut, R. E. (2016). The relationship between Facebook use and well-being depends on communication type and tie strength.Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 21(4), 265–281. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12162
  10. Brady, W. J., Wills, J. A., Jost, J. T., Tucker, J. A., & Van Bavel, J. J. (2017). Emotion shapes the diffusion of moralized content in social networks.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(28), 7313–7318. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1618923114
  11. Bucher, T. (2018).If...then: Algorithmic power and politics. Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/oso/9780190493028.001.0001.
  12. Gillespie, T. (2014). The relevance of algorithms. In T. Gillespie, P. J. Boczkowski, & K. A. Foot (Eds.),Media technologies: Essays on communication, materiality, and society(pp. 167–194). MIT Press. doi: 10.7551/mitpress/9780262525374.003.0009.
  13. Cohen, J. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales.Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20(1), 37–46. doi: 10.1177/001316446002000104.
  14. Hilbe, J. M. (2011).Negative binomial regression(2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.