The Source Credibility of Information's Impact on Individuals' Correction of Health Misinformation
Abstract
Nowadays, people prefer to use social media to search for information, such as health support. However, it is important to make sure the quality of some information on social media is correct, as wrong information may mislead people who do not have the ability to judge. Because of the widespread use of social media, information is disseminated in a timely manner and spreads like a virus. Many articles on social media create a channel for the spreading of pseudoscience, so that health misinformation is spreading faster than before. Because of other elements, people choose not to rectify misinformation. Source credibility is one of the key elements that influences people's correct intentions. Using the Elaboration Likelihood Model (ELM) can help better judge people's original intention of correcting misinformation. The ELM model can better explain how source credibility influences an individual's correct intention, and the important role source credibility has in the process of rectifying misinformation. This thesis mainly discusses the relationship between source credibility, health misinformation, and correction intention.
References
- Stimpson, J. P., Park, S., Adhikari, E. H., Nelson, D. B., & Ortega, A. N. (2025). Perceived health misinformation on social media and public trust in health care.Medical Care, 63, 686–693. DOI: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000002180.
- Kbaier, D., Kane, A., McJury, M., & Kenny, I. (2024). Prevalence of health misinformation on social media-challenges and mitigation before, during, and beyond the COVID-19 pandemic: Scoping literature review.Journal of Medical Internet Research, 26, e38786. DOI: 10.2196/38786.
- Choi, S., Anderson, A. A., Cagle, S., Long, M., & Kelp, N. (2023). Scientists' deficit perception of the public impedes their behavioral intentions to correct misinformation.PLOS ONE, 18, e0287870. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0287870.
- Duan, P., Liu, Z., Chen, S., Liang, W., Hou, P., Qian, L., Wang, W., & Liu, Y. (2026). Multifactorial predictive model for nurses' intention to correct online health misinformation: A machine-learning and SHAP analysis.Public Health, 258, 106393. DOI: 10.1016/j.puhe.2026.106393.
- Johnson, V., Butterfuss, R., & Kendeou, P. (2024). Dynamic source credibility and its impacts on knowledge revision.Memory & Cognition, 52, 1548–1566. DOI: 10.3758/s13421-024-01562-3.
- Wang, J., Jiang, N., Li, H., & Jia, S. (2026). How influencer credibility relates to purchase intention toward upcycled foods: Evidence from Chinese social media users.Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 10, 1829877. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2026.1829877
- Chen, M., Wang, J., Du, H., Li, J., & Sun, Z. (2026). Risk prediction and formation mechanism of health misinformation on social media.Information Studies: Theory & Application, 1–14. https://link.cnki.net/urlid/11.1762.G3.20260731.1522.002
- Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.),Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 19, 123–205. Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60214-2
- Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986).Communication and persuasion: Central and peripheral routes to attitude change. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-4964-1
- Yu, L., Liang, X., Chen, Y., & Li, J. (2026). Exploring patients' overall satisfaction, trust and information adoption behaviour towards an online healthcare platform based on the elaboration likelihood model.Behaviour & Information Technology. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2026.2660225