Research Article

Resemblance or Influence? George Smith, W.A. Cornaby, and the Comparison Between Guanyin-Virgin Mary

Luna Jiayi Yu*
Carnegie Mellon University

* Corresponding author: [email protected]

Abstract

This paper examines how British missionaries George Smith and W. A. Cornaby interpreted the resemblance between the Buddhist bodhisattva Guanyin and the Christian Virgin Mary figure in nineteenth and early twentieth-century China. Rather than asking whether the two religious images were historically connected, this paper focuses on how missionaries used Christian interpretive frameworks in order to explain their resemblance. Through close readings of Smith's A Narrative of an Exploratory Visit (1847) and Cornaby's The Call of Cathay (1910) publications, this paper argues that the two missionaries share similar visual evidence yet different historical meanings. Smith recognized the parallels between Buddhism and Christianity but separated religious resemblance from historical causation, while Cornaby treated resemblance as evidence of earlier Christian influence on Buddhism. This comparison shows that missionary writings did not simply record religious similarities. Instead, missionaries actively produced historical explanations by deciding what counted as evidence, how religious influence moved in an unfamiliar region, and what kinds of historical relationships were produced between religions.

Keywords: Guanyin; Virgin Mary; British missionaries; religious comparison; Christian-Buddhist encounters
Published: October 27, 2026
DOI: 10.54254/2753-7064/2026.38404
Volume: CHR Vol.125
pp. 150-156
Download PDF

References

  1. Pham, K. D. (2021, May 7). Compassion, mercy, and love: Guanyin and the Virgin Mary.The Metropolitan Museum of Art.
  2. Smith, G. (1847).A narrative of an exploratory visit to each of the consular cities of China, and to the islands of Hong Kong and Chusan: In behalf of the Church Missionary Society, in the years 1844, 1845, 1846. London: Seeley, Burnside, and Seeley.
  3. Cornaby, W. A. (1910).The call of Cathay: A study in missionary work and opportunity in China old and new. London: Wesleyan Methodist Missionary Society.
  4. Bracken, G. (2019). Treaty ports in China: Their genesis, development, and influence.Journal of Urban History, 45(1), 168–176.
  5. Reinders, E. (2004).Borrowed gods and foreign bodies: Christian missionaries imagine Chinese religion. University of California Press. Berkeley.
  6. Yue, I. (2009). Missionaries (mis-)representing China: Orientalism, religion, and the conceptualization of Victorian cultural identity.Victorian Literature and Culture, 37(1), 1–10.
  7. Kling, D. W. (2020). Protestant entrance and Christian expansion (1840-1950). InA history of Christian conversion(pp. 468–493). Oxford University Press. Oxford.
  8. Lai, J. T. P. (2010). Doctrinal dispute within interdenominational missions: The Shanghai Tract Committee in the 1840s.Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society, 20(3), 307–317.
  9. Xi, L. (2017). Missionaries in the making of vernacular Christianity in China. In P. Woods (Ed.),Shaping Christianity in Greater China: Indigenous Christians in focus(pp. 27–40). Wipf and Stock Publishers. Eugene, OR.
  10. Davis, J. F. (1836).The Chinese: A general description of the empire of China and its inhabitants(Vol. 2). Charles Knight & Co. London.
  11. Cornaby, Rev. William Arthur. (1906). InWho’s who in the Far East, 1906-7(p. 62). China Mail. Hong Kong.