Research Article

Problematic Short-Video Use and Academic Procrastination: The Potential Role of Subjective Time Distance

Zihao Xie*
Zhuhai College of Science and Technology

* Corresponding author: [email protected]

Abstract

Short videos are a familiar part of students' daily lives, but some students find it difficult to stop watching when academic work is waiting. Problematic use concerns this loss of control and interference with other activities, rather than viewing time alone. Direct evidence concerning academic procrastination is limited. The most direct study reviewed reports a weak positive association between problematic short-video use and academic procrastination, but its cross-sectional design leaves the direction unclear. Difficulties with attentional control and the appeal of short-term mood relief offer possible explanations for why students turn away from academic work. This review also considers subjective time distance: how near or far away an academic deadline feels from the present. Research on construal level provides a reason to examine this experience alongside attention and mood, although no study reviewed here directly tests its role in the relationship between short-video use and academic procrastination. Clarifying these distinctions may help future studies separate difficulties in stopping viewing from the decision to postpone an intended academic task.

Keywords: Problematic short-video use; academic procrastination; subjective time distance; attentional control; emotion regulation
Published: October 20, 2026
DOI: 10.54254/2753-7064/2026.BJ38053
Volume: CHR Vol.126
pp. 15-20
Download PDF

References

  1. Zhao, H., & Wagner, C. (2023). How TikTok leads users to flow experience: Investigating the effects of technology affordances with user experience level and video length as moderators.Internet Research, 33, 820-849. https://doi.org/10.1108/INTR-08-2021-0595
  2. Schellewald, A. (2023). Understanding the popularity and affordances of TikTok through user experiences.Media, Culture & Society, 45, 1568-1582. https://doi.org/10.1177/01634437221144562
  3. Li, T., Liu, H., Hu, R., & Liu, X. (2025). Research insights on 'problematic use of short video': A comprehensive review exploration in psychological context.Addiction Biology, 30, e70082. https://doi.org/10.1111/adb.70082
  4. Steel, P. (2007). The nature of procrastination: A meta-analytic and theoretical review of quintessential self-regulatory failure.Psychological Bulletin, 133, 65-94. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.133.1.65
  5. Xie, J., Xu, X., Zhang, Y., Tan, Y., Wu, D., Shi, M., & Huang, H. (2023). The effect of short-form video addiction on undergraduates' academic procrastination: A moderated mediation model.Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1298361. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1298361
  6. Rogowska, A. M., & Cincio, A. (2024). Procrastination mediates the relationship between problematic TikTok use and depression among young adults.Journal of Clinical Medicine, 13, 1247. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13051247
  7. Klingsieck, K. B. (2013). Procrastination: When good things don't come to those who wait.European Psychologist, 18, 24-34. https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040/a000138
  8. Tao, X., Hanif, H., & Lieqin, W. (2025). The effects of self-regulated learning strategies on academic procrastination and academic success among college EFL students in China.Frontiers in Psychology, 16, 1562980. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1562980
  9. Sirois, F., & Pychyl, T. (2013). Procrastination and the priority of short-term mood regulation: Consequences for future self.Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 7, 115-127. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12011
  10. Jin, Y., Zhou, W., Zhang, Y., Yang, Z., & Hussain, Z. (2024). Smartphone distraction and academic anxiety: The mediating role of academic procrastination and the moderating role of time management disposition.Behavioral Sciences, 14, 820. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs14090820
  11. Hidalgo-Fuentes, S. (2022). Problematic smartphone use and procrastination in the academic setting: A meta-analysis.Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 20, 449–468. https://doi.org/10.25115/ejrep.v20i57.5629
  12. Weidlich, J., Yau, J., & Kreijns, K. (2024). Social presence and psychological distance: A construal level account for online distance learning.Education and Information Technologies, 29, 401–423. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12289-0
  13. McCrea, S. M., Liberman, N., Trope, Y., & Sherman, S. J. (2008). Construal level and procrastination.Psychological Science, 19, 1308–1314. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02240.x
  14. Turel, O., & Cavagnaro, D. R. (2019). Effect of abstinence from social media on time perception: Differences between low- and at-risk for social media 'addiction' groups.Psychiatric Quarterly, 90, 217–227. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11126-018-9614-3