Communications in Humanities Research ISSN: 2753-7072
Home> Volumes> Volume CHR Vol.119> Article
Research Article

Affective Bond Between AI-Generated Music and Human Listeners

Nanfei Wang*
Xinghai Conservatory of Music

* Corresponding author: [email protected]

Abstract

Generative artificial intelligence is being applied to create music in an ever-widening range, but it has not been determined whether the results can effectively convey human emotions. A controlled-variable experimental design is used to explore the causal relationship between information density in prompts and listeners' affective recognition of AI-generated music. Six AI-generated musical works were selected as the experimental stimuli under three increasing levels of prompt conditions: minimal emotional descriptions, prompts that added harmonic progression information, and detailed prompts including parameters such as instrumentation, vocal processing and dynamic changes. The results showed that listeners could not understand the creators' purposes in either the minimal-prompt or harmony-augmented situations. All 30 listeners were able to feel the emotion and structure that were desired, and they could do so after repeated instructions. The study also found that the audio outputs of AI music systems generally have logical discontinuities and perceptual incongruity without fine-grained human encoding intervention. This paper proposes that AI functions as a medium for music creation, and its affective communication performance is based on a closed-loop human intervention system at two stages: prompt engineering (information encoding) and generative evaluation (signal decoding). This study offers empirical support and practical paths for human-AI collaboration models in AI-assisted music creation.

Keywords: AI-generated music; affective bond; prompt engineering; human-AI collaboration; controlled experiment
Published: October 13, 2026
DOI: 10.54254/2753-7064/2026.BJ37700
Volume: CHR Vol.119
pp. 165-174
Download PDF

References

  1. Tschacher, W., Greenwood, S., Weining, C., Wald-Fuhrmann, M., Ramakrishnan, C., Seibert, C., & Tröndle, M. (2024). Physiological audience synchrony in classical concerts linked with listeners' experiences and attitudes.Scientific Reports, 14(1), 16412.
  2. Juslin, P. N., & Västfjäll, D. (2008). Emotional responses to music: The need to consider underlying mechanisms.Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 31(5), 559-575.
  3. Juslin, P. N. (2013). From everyday emotions to aesthetic emotions: Towards a unified theory of musical emotions.Physics of Life Reviews, 10(3), 235-266.
  4. Hong, J.-W., Fischer, K., & Ha, Y. (2022). Human, I wrote a song for you: An experiment testing the influence of machines' attributes on the AI-composed music evaluation.Computers in Human Behavior, 131, 107239.
  5. Xu, K., Xu, B., & Xie, Z. (2026). Beyond composer labels: Aesthetic awe in music composed by humans and AI.Computers in Human Behavior, 182, 109020.
  6. Wu, S. H., & Holmes, K. J. (2026). Is there a "mind" behind the music? Attributing music to AI can suppress narrative meaning-making.Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications.
  7. Song, B., Zhang, Z. Y., & Hou, J. C. (2022). An investigation to the neural mechanism of aesthetic emotional experience in music from the perspective of neuroaesthetics.Journal of Xinghai Conservatory of Music, (4), 125-138.
  8. Ng, S., Sargent, K., & Snell, J. J. (2025). Cyborg synchrony: Integrating human physiology into affective generative music AI.Frontiers in Computer Science, 7, 1593905.
  9. Husserl, E. (1931).Cartesian meditations. Martinus Nijhoff.
  10. Heidegger, M. (1927).Being and time. Max Niemeyer Verlag.
  11. Hoorn, J. F., et al. (2026). Music and empathetic speech in AI robots.ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction.