Algorithmic Amplification of Fan Circle Mentality: A Study of Chinese Table Tennis National Team Fandom on Social Media
Abstract
The development of social media has greatly changed people's way of thinking. The algorithmic recommendation system continuously exposes netizens to content that aligns with their existing stances, thereby reinforcing their viewpoints and potentially provoking extreme speech and behaviors. This research aims to find out whether and how the algorithms extremify people's viewpoints. By studying posts and comments on Sina Weibo and RedNotes (using a 5-point scale and content analysis), this research finds differences between the two platforms, with Weibo being more emotional and RedNotes being more rational and less extreme. Most posts have an obvious tendency and comments under the post usually share the same stance, suggesting that users with similar stances are either exposed to similar content or are influenced by others' comments into changing their views. This research sheds light on the relationship between algorithmic recommendation and collective opinion, quantifies the ideological leaning of posts on social media, fills the research gap concerning fandom in the sports domain, and provides practical guidance for the regulation of social media.
References
- Asur, S., et al. (2011). What trends in Chinese social media.SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1888779
- Number of internet users by country 2025| Statista. (2025).Statista. www.statista.com/statistics/262966/number-of-internet-users-in-selected-countries/?srsltid=AfmBOoofTvCvZJnPSEXOr0bo18QV2QBLrAHilpScv4mkOTl3yNb2bfBm. Accessed 1 Jan. 2026.
- Bo, D., & Shi, Z. (2025). How algorithmic recommendation shapes online emotional diffusion: Mechanisms, heterogeneity, and causal identification—Evidence from Weibo.Advances in Psychology, 15(9), 227–234. https://doi.org/10.12677/ap.2025.159512. Accessed 2 Jan. 2026.
- Beijing Youth Daily. (2024, August). Courting controversy: The impact of “fan circles” on table tennis.SixthTone. www.sixthtone.com/news/1015702. Accessed 2 Jan. 2026.
- GT staff reporters. (2024). Distorted fan culture erodes sports community, sparking concern and reflection among the public - Global Times.Globaltimes.cn. www.globaltimes.cn/page/202408/1317482.shtml. Accessed 2 Jan. 2026.
- Davie, G. (2014, May 21). Spiral of silence.Mass Communication Theory. masscommtheory.com/theory-overviews/spiral-of-silence/. Accessed 19 May 2026.
- Echo chamber effect | EBSCO. (2021).EBSCO Information Services, Inc.. www.ebsco.com/research-starters/communication-and-mass-media/echo-chamber-effect
- Ungvarsky, J. (2020). Uses and gratifications theory | EBSCO.EBSCO Information Services, Inc.. www.ebsco.com/research-starters/communication-and-mass-media/uses-and-gratifications-theory
- Le Bon, G.The crowd: A study of the popular mind.
- Maj, J., & Krümm.The influence of social media on crowd behavior and the operational environment.
- Postica, M. (2017, February 11). The filter bubble.Academia.edu. www.academia.edu/31377094/The_Filter_Bubble?sm=b&rhid=40268676001
- Jia, B., et al. (2021, December 24). Transformation of fan culture under the influence of social media.Www.atlantis-Press.com. www.atlantis-press.com/proceedings/ichess-21/125967353
- Yin, Y. (2021). “My baby should feel no wronged!”: Digital fandoms and emotional capitalism in China.Global Media and China, 6(4), 205943642110416. https://doi.org/10.1177/20594364211041681
- Meggs, J., & Ahmed, W. (2021). Applying cognitive analytic theory to understand the abuse of athletes on Twitter.Managing Sport and Leisure, 29(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/23750472.2021.2004210
- Yin. (2020). An emergent algorithmic culture: The data-ization of online fandom in China.International Journal of Cultural Studies, 23(4), 475–492. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367877920908269
- Gao, Y., et al. (2023). Echo chamber effects on short video platforms.Scientific Reports, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-33370-1
- Goldenberg, A., et al. (2021). The crowd-emotion-amplification effect.Psychological Science, 32(3), 437–450. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797620970561