Research Article

On the Differential Presentation Features of Narrative Time in Chinese Historiographical Literature

Hongyi Ye*
Xinjiang Hetian College

* Corresponding author: [email protected]

Abstract

This paper analyzes the differentiated narrative time mechanisms embedded in classical Chinese historiographical (or zhuàn, biographical historical) literary texts, taking two representative canonical masterpieces of Chinese classical historiographical literature, Records of the Grand Historian (the first biographical general history in Chinese history) and Comprehensive Mirror in Aid of Governance (one of the most influential annalistic general histories compiled in the Northern Song dynasty), as comparative research samples. Through systematic comparative analysis from two core dimensions of long-established editorial conventions and underlying authorial creative motivations, this study reveals that the divergence of their narrative time systems is jointly driven by the inherent structural differences between biographical and annalistic historiographical traditions, as well as the essential distinction between private scholarly ambition for independent thought construction and the official mandate of providing practical governance reference for imperial rulers. This study provides global cross-cultural audiences without specialized sinology background with a concise, easy-to-apply analytical framework to understand the distinctive expressive conventions of Chinese classical narratives, and fills relevant longstanding cognitive gaps in cross-cultural communication and comparative literature research scenarios.

Keywords: Chinese historiographical literary texts; narrative time; cross-cultural communication; Records of the Grand Historian; Comprehensive Mirror in Aid of Governance
Published: September 22, 2026
DOI: 10.54254/2753-7064/2026.HT37231
Volume: CHR Vol.115
pp. 108-116
Download PDF

References

  1. Cheng, X. (2007). The spatial turn in narrative theory: An overview of narrative space theory.Jiangxi Social Sciences, 11, 25–35.
  2. Genette, G. (2025).Narrative discourse: New narrative discourse(Trans. by Wang, W). China Social Sciences Press. (Original work published 1972).
  3. Gholami, Z., Mohammadi Badr, N., & Yazdani Ahmadabadi, H. (2025). Analysis of.Research in Narrative Literature, 14(4), 165-190.
  4. Kai, K. (1985). Aspects of derivation in Chinese narrative.Chinese Literature: Essays, Articles, Reviews, 1-36.
  5. van Ess, H., Lomová, O., & Schaab-Hanke, D. (Eds.). (2015).Views from within, views from beyond: Approaches to the Shiji as an early work of historiography. Harrassowitz Verlag.
  6. Hartman, C. (2012).Chinese historiography in the age of maturity, 960–1368(pp. 37-57). Oxford University Press,Oxford.
  7. Luo, Y. (2026). The literati's imaginations of historical learning: A comparative study of the dynastic history textbooks in twelfth-to early-fourteenth-century China.Chinese Studies in History, 1-21.
  8. Sima, Q. (2025).Records of the Grand Historian (Shiji). National Library of China Publishing House.
  9. Yang, Y. (2023).Chinese narratology I: Heaven and human. Routledge.
  10. Xiao, J. (2025). Compilation methodology of chronological local historical records: Taking the compilation process of Comprehensive Mirror in Aid of Governance as an example.Youth Literator, (15), 135-137.
  11. Zhu, T. (2018). Position, documents and state: A study of scribes in the Qin bureaucracy.Modern Law Science, 40(2), 41-56.