Research Article

F itspiration on S ocial M edia and A dolescent B ody I mage: S ocial C omparison, S elf- o bjectification, and D ifferential S usceptibility

Ziqian Li*
The University of Sydney

* Corresponding author: [email protected]

Abstract

This research employs a literature-based analytical approach to investigate the correlation between adolescents' body image and appearance-focused fitspiration on social media. It emphasizes specific fitness and beauty narratives that adolescents encounter on visual and short-video platforms, rather than seeing screen time as a uniform source of impact. The Differential Susceptibility to Media Effects Model, Objectification Theory, Tripartite Influence Model, and Social Comparison Theory are employed to evaluate contemporary research. The examination indicates that interaction centred on appearance is more reliably linked to body-image issues than overall social media usage, with upward appearance comparison serving as one of the most compelling rationales for this connection. Nevertheless, the current data lack a clear or universal direct impact. While body monitoring remains a theoretically relevant but understudied process in teenage fitspiration research, individual and cultural factors such as peer appearance pressure and self-esteem may impact susceptibility. The data strengthens the evidence for a more conditional and content-specific explanation of fitspiration and offers areas of attention for future long-term research.

Keywords: Fitspiration; Adolescent Body Image; Social Comparison; Self-Objectification; Social Media
Published: September 22, 2026
DOI: 10.54254/2753-7064/2026.BJ37081
Volume: CHR Vol.119
pp. 97-104
Download PDF

References

  1. Uhls, Y. T., Ellison, N. B., & Subrahmanyam, K. (2017). Benefits and costs of social media in adolescence.Pediatrics, 140(Suppl. 2), S67-S70. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2016-1758E
  2. Pryde, S., & Prichard, I. (2022). TikTok on the clock but the #fitspo don't stop: The impact of TikTok fitspiration videos on women's body image concerns.Body Image, 43, 244-252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2022.09.004
  3. Pryde, S., Kemps, E., & Prichard, I. (2024). 'You started working out to get a flat stomach and a fat a$$': A content analysis of fitspiration videos on TikTok.Body Image, 51, 101769. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2024.101769
  4. Jarman, H. K., Marques, M. D., McLean, S. A., Slater, A., & Paxton, S. J. (2021). Social media, body satisfaction and well-being among adolescents: A mediation model of appearance-ideal internalization and comparison.Body Image, 36, 139-148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2020.11.005
  5. Vincente-Benito, I., & Ramírez-Durán, M. del V. (2023). Influence of social media use on body image and well-being among adolescents and young adults: A systematic review.Journal of Psychosocial Nursing and Mental Health Services, 61(12), 11-18. https://doi.org/10.3928/02793695-20230524-02
  6. Scully, M., Swords, L., & Nixon, E. (2023). Social comparisons on social media: Online appearance-related activity and body dissatisfaction in adolescent girls.Irish Journal of Psychological Medicine, 40(1), 31–42. https://doi.org/10.1017/ipm.2020.93
  7. Vandenbosch, L., Fardouly, J., & Tiggemann, M. (2022). Social media and body image: Recent trends and future directions.Current Opinion in Psychology, 45, Art. no. 101289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2021.12.002
  8. Vuong, T., Jarman, H. K., Doley, J. R., & McLean, S. A. (2021). Social media use and body dissatisfaction in adolescents: The moderating role of thin- and muscular-ideal internalisation.International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(24), 13222. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182413222
  9. Choukas-Bradley, S., Roberts, S. R., Maheux, A. J., & Nesi, J. (2022). The perfect storm: A developmental-sociocultural framework for the role of social media in adolescent girls' body image concerns and mental health.Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 25(4), 681–701. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10567-022-00404-5
  10. Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes.Human Relations, 7(2), 117–140. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872675400700202
  11. van den Berg, P., Thompson, J. K., Obremski-Brandon, K., & Coovert, M. (2002). The tripartite influence model of body image and eating disturbance: A covariance structure modeling investigation testing the mediational role of appearance comparison.Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 53(5), 1007–1020. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3999(02)00499-3
  12. Roberts, S. R., Maheux, A. J., Hunt, R. A., Ladd, B. A., & Choukas-Bradley, S. (2022). Incorporating social media and muscular ideal internalization into the tripartite influence model of body image: Towards a modern understanding of adolescent girls' body dissatisfaction.Body Image, 41, 239–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2022.03.002
  13. Fredrickson, B. L., & Roberts, T.-A. (1997). Objectification theory: Toward understanding women's lived experiences and mental health risks.Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21(2), 173–206. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1997.tb00108.x
  14. Choukas-Bradley, S., Nesi, J., Widman, L., & Galla, B. M. (2020). The appearance-related social media consciousness scale: Development and validation with adolescents.Body Image, 33, 164–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2020.02.017
  15. Valkenburg, P. M., & Peter, J. (2013). The differential susceptibility to media effects model.Journal of Communication, 63(2), 221–243. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12024
  16. Rodgers, R. F., & Rousseau, A. (2022). Social media and body image: Modulating effects of social identities and user characteristics.Body Image, 41, 284–291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2022.02.009
  17. Mendelson, B. K., Mendelson, M. J., & White, D. R. (2001). Body-esteem scale for adolescents and adults.Journal of Personality Assessment, 76(1), 90–106. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327752JPA7601_6
  18. Jarman, H. K., McLean, S. A., Marques, M. D., Slater, A., Paxton, S. J., & Fuller-Tyszkiewicz, M. (2024). Understanding what drives adolescent social media behaviours: Informing approaches for interventions.Body Image, 51, Article 101793. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2024.101793
  19. Harriger, J. A., Thompson, J. K., & Tiggemann, M. (2023). TikTok, TikTok, the time is now: Future directions in social media and body image.Body Image, 44, 222–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2023.01.005