Fragmented Dissemination of Literature on Social Media in the Digital Age: Mechanisms and Cultural Implications
Abstract
This study reviews the fragmented sharing of literary content across mainstream social media platforms. Drawing on twenty relevant academic studies published between 2010 and 2025, the paper explores the driving forces behind literary fragmentation, how platform design reshapes literary texts, and its practical influences on public reading behaviours. Platforms such as Instagram and TikTok structurally split complete literary texts into short, digestible snippets. People circulate these fragments for various purposes, including time‑saving reading, commercial profit‑making, and building online reading‑centred communities. Fragmented communication lowers the access threshold for literary works and helps literature reach broader audiences. Nevertheless, it also brings visible drawbacks. Isolated excerpts may trigger audience misunderstandings of original texts and promote superficial reading habits. Most existing research focuses on Western social media environments, while literary fragmentation on Chinese domestic platforms remains underexplored. This paper argues that fragmented literary dissemination cannot be simply judged as positive or negative. Its actual cultural effect largely depends on how audiences, content creators, and platforms use this form of communication.
References
- Shakargy, N. (2021). "I am not myself, you see?": Remediation and mediatization in the Insta Novels project.Social Media + Society, 7(3), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051211047413
- Elliott, K. (2023). Bite-sizing digital literature in the twenty-first century.Adaptation, 16(2), 116–137. https://doi.org/10.1093/adaptation/apad014
- Striphas, T. (2015). Algorithmic culture.European Journal of Cultural Studies, 18(4‑5), 395‑412. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367549415577392
- Jones, K. (2022). BookTok 101: TikTok, digital literacies, and out‑of‑school reading practices.Literacy. https://doi.org/10.1111/lit.12489
- King, E. G. C. (2022). Unpacking the "Red Flag" bookshelf: Negotiating fragmented literary value on Twitter.English Studies, 103(5), 706‑731. https://doi.org/10.1080/0013838X.2022.2087037
- Murray, R. (2018). Twitter fiction and the art of brevity.Narrative Studies, 14(3), 89-101. https://doi.org/10.1080/1541763X.2018.1524476
- Hayles, N. K. (2012).How we think: Digital media and contemporary reading. University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226321379.001.0001
- Mannell, K., & Smith, E. T. (2022). Alternative social media and the complexities of a more participatory culture: A view from Scuttlebutt.Social Media + Society, 8(4), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051221134474
- Pianzola, F., Rebora, S., & Lauer, G. (2020). Wattpad as a resource for literary studies. Quantitative and qualitative examples of the importance of digital social reading and readers' comments in the margins.PLOS ONE, 15(8), e0226708. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0226708
- Knox, J. (2024). 'Real' reel poetry: Examining co-digital motherhood communities through reel instapoetry.New Review of Hypermedia and Multimedia, 30(1-2), 59-93. https://doi.org/10.1080/13614568.2024.2369516
- Whaley, K. (2021). BookTok and the new global literary economy.Publishing Research Quarterly, 37(4), 512-526. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12109-021-09839-9
- Asplund, S. B., Egeland, B. L., & Olin-Scheller, C. (2024). Sharing is caring: Young people's narratives about BookTok and volitional reading.Language and Education, 38(4), 635-651. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500782.2024.2324947
- Dera, J. (2024). BookTok: A narrative review of current literature and directions for future research.Literature Compass, 21(11-12), e70012. https://doi.org/10.1111/lic3.70012
- Low, B., & Ehret, C. (2023). Algorithmic imaginings and critical digital literacy on #BookTok.New Media & Society, 27(4), 2336-2353. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448231206466