Research Article

Research on Public Interaction in the Comment Section of Douyin Accounts: Taking Douyin Influencer "Datou Zezi"as an Example

Silan Cai*
Dongguan City University

* Corresponding author: [email protected]

Abstract

As a leading short-video platform with a high user daily active rate, the comment sections of regional culture-related bloggers on Douyin serve as an ideal venue for observing the interactions within real social communities. This paper integrates dialogue theory and symbolic interaction theory, and regards the comment section of "Datou Zezi"as a "symbolic dialogue field", analyzing the inter-constructive mechanism of multi-voice dialogue structure and shared symbol system. It adopts the case study method and qualitative content analysis method using the comment section of "Datou Zezi" as a case. However, current research lacks in-depth examinations of spontaneous daily interactions based on a common regional culture. There are few theoretical studies that integrate conversation theory with symbolic interactionism. This study reveals that the comment section constitutes a "symbolic dialogue space". The interaction between dialogue and symbols forms inherent rules and Guangdong culture. By integrating the theories of dialogue and symbol interaction, it fills the gap in the micro-study of regional cultural communities of individual bloggers.

Keywords: Douyin; Regional Culture; Fan Community; Symbolic Interaction; Multi-voice Dialogue
Published: September 15, 2026
DOI: 10.54254/2753-7064/2026.BA36954
Volume: CHR Vol.123
pp. 1-6
Download PDF

References

  1. Lyu, Y. X., & Zhang, Y. (2022). Research on interactive communication strategies of cultural symbols in short video platforms.Publishing Wide Angle, (2), 70–73. https://doi.org/10.16491/j.cnki.cn45-1216/g2.2022.02.01
  2. Wen, H. (2019). Bakhtin's dialogic theory and the publicity of interpretation.Chinese Literature Research, (1), 28–34.
  3. Yuan, X. C., & Zhao, X. (2021). Discourse practice analysis of government-citizen interaction on government TikTok accounts: Taking public security government TikTok as an example.Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics (Social Sciences Edition), 34(2), 53–64. https://doi.org/10.13766/j.bhsk.1008-2204.2021.0010
  4. Chen, Y. Q. (2019). Discourse analysis of "news commentary" in People's Daily new media: A case study of WeChat subscription account.News Front, (23), 66–69.
  5. Dutceac Segesten, A., Bossetta, M., Holmberg, N., & Niehorster, D. (2022). The cueing power of comments on social media: How disagreement in Facebook comments affects user engagement with news.Information, Communication & Society, 25(8), 1115–1134.
  6. Melani, E. R., & Zamzamy, A. (2023). Symbolic interaction in TikTok's live streaming: A study of influencer-viewers engagement.Jurnal Spektrum Komunikasi, 11(4), 550–561.
  7. Blumer, H. (1986).Symbolic interactionism: Perspective and method. Univ of California Press.
  8. Guo, A. L. (2022). Research on the strong social attributes of Douyin short videos from the perspective of interaction methods.Journalism Communication, (17), 59–61.
  9. Lubis, D. N., Tantira, N., Simbolon, F. V., Marunduri, A. M., & Rangkuti, R. (2025). Humor and sarcasm in TikTok comments on@ fujiiian's videos: A multimodal discourse analysis.Journal Corner of Education, Linguistics, and Literature, 5(1), 685–702.
  10. Wang, Z., & Liu, X. W. (2025). Digital communities: New individual-collective relationships and evolutionary logic in the information society.Social Science Research, (5), 128–138.