Communications in Humanities Research ISSN: 2753-7072
Home> Volumes> Volume CHR Vol.109> Article
Research Article

Teacher Strategies for Reducing AI Generated Content in English Major Student Writing

Yuehan HouXinjiang Normal University*

* Corresponding author: [email protected]

Abstract

Generative AI can produce fluent prose before students have worked through the linguistic choices that writing courses are intended to teach. This study examined how one university instructor responded to that problem in a second-year English-major writing course. Forty-two students (18 men and 24 women; mean age = 20.3 years) participated in a 16-week concurrent embedded mixed-methods study. The instructor compared AI-probability estimates from GPTZero, Originality.AI, and Turnitin, returned passage-level feedback, and taught four sessions on making context-sensitive lexical choices without asking AI to rewrite students' work. Questionnaires, interviews with six students, three sets of writing samples, and course scores supplied the data. Across Weeks 5, 10, and 15, the mean estimated share of AI-generated text fell from 51.2% to 35.8% and then to 23.6%. Overall AI-tool use also declined, while mean writing scores rose from 72.4 to 85.9. Students most often associated AI use with difficulty expressing ideas accurately, limited time, and pressure to obtain higher grades. By the end of the semester, more students distinguished grammar assistance from having AI compose a paper. Because the study involved one class and no control group, these changes should be read as associations rather than proof of a causal effect. Even so, the findings illustrate how transparent checking, individualized revision, and lexical instruction can be combined in a classroom response to AI-dependent writing.

Keywords: generative AI; English major writing; teacher strategies; academic integrity; AI-generated content
Published: September 8, 2026
DOI: 10.54254/2753-7064/2026.NS36691
Volume: CHR Vol.109
pp. 169-174
Download PDF

References

  1. Flitcroft, M. A., Sheriff, S. A., Wolfrath, N., et al. (2024). Performance of artificial intelligence content detectors using human and artificial intelligence-generated scientific writing.Annals of Surgical Oncology, 31(10), 6387–6393.
  2. Han, J., Yang, Y., & Liu, G. (2025). Are teachers assessing work written by students or by AI? A rapid literature review of research on detecting content generated by generative AI.European Journal of Education, 60(1), e70240.
  3. Cotton, D. R. E., Cotton, P. A., & Shipway, J. R. (2024). Chatting and cheating: Ensuring academic integrity in the era of ChatGPT.Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 61(2), 228–239.
  4. Zhao, X., & Li, M. (2024). Chinese university students' perceptions and use of generative AI in academic writing: A mixed-methods study.Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 27(4), 112–128.
  5. Wu, R. T., & Dang, R. R. (2023). ChatGPT in head and neck scientific writing: A precautionary anecdote.American Journal of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Medicine and Surgery, 44(6), 103980.
  6. Saha, S., & Feizi, S. (2025). AI detection tools: Systematic testing and reliability concerns.University of Maryland Technical Report.
  7. Weber-Wulff, D., et al. (2023). Testing of detection tools for AI-generated text.International Journal for Educational Integrity, 19(1), 1-17.
  8. Perkins, M. (2023). Academic integrity considerations of AI large language models in the post-pandemic era.Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 20(2), 1-24.
  9. Kickbusch, S., et al. (2025). The next era of assessment: Key touchpoints in AI-free, AI-assisted, and AI-integrated assessment designs.Digital Education Council.
  10. Wen, Q. F. (2024). Foreign language teaching in the age of artificial intelligence: Challenges and opportunities.Foreign Language World(1), 2-8.
  11. Malik, J., et al. (2023). Student perceptions of AI in academic essay writing.Journal of Educational Technology, 15(4), 223-245.
  12. Xiao, Y., & Zhi, Q. (2023). ChatGPT as a learning partner: Student perspectives on AI-assisted writing.Computer Assisted Language Learning, 36(8), 1-25.
  13. Roe, J., Renandya, W. A., & Handoyo, P. (2023). The role of AI in language assessment: Opportunities and threats.Language Assessment Quarterly, 20(3), 245-262.
  14. Pecorari, D., & Petrić, B. (2014). Plagiarism in second-language writing.Language Teaching, 47(3), 269-302.
  15. Zhang, X. (2024). Solution-oriented versus problem-oriented approaches to academic integrity.Journal of Academic Ethics, 22(1), 45-62.