Research Article

Narrative Structure Transformation in Mixed Reality Moving Images: A Study on Cross-media Screenwriting Practice

Jiarong SongUniversity of Sydney*

* Corresponding author: [email protected]

Abstract

Mixed reality (MR) fundamentally alters the spatial and temporal conditions of moving-image narratives. Unlike conventional cinema, where the frame dictates visual access, MR enables physical space and digital elements to coexist, repositioning the spectator as an active participant. This paper examines how narrative structures transform under these conditions and what this entails for screenwriters. Drawing on classical narratology and practice-based research, the study analyzes three works—Bettina Frankham's In a Minor Key, Alejandro G. Iñárritu's Carne y Arena, and Edward Berger's Submerged. Three principal shifts are identified: plot architecture becomes modular rather than sequential; point of view becomes embodied rather than optically directed; temporal organization becomes elastic rather than fixed. These findings suggest that traditional three-act models give way to spatially distributed, non-linear designs, requiring screenwriting to expand beyond the master-scene format toward diagrammatic and modular documentation. Cross-media screenwriting in MR is less about adapting film scripts and more about designing experiential systems that balance authorial intention with participant agency.

Keywords: mixed reality; narrative structure; cross-media screenwriting; interactive cinema; narratology
Published: September 8, 2026
DOI: 10.54254/2753-7064/2026.36582
Volume: CHR Vol.117
pp. 94-99
Download PDF

References

  1. Frankham, B. (2024). The diagrammatic screenplay: Strategies to address the challenges of writing an interactive, mixed reality experience. In K. Dooley & A. Munt (Eds.),Screenwriting for virtual reality: Story, space and experience(pp. 155–178). Palgrave Macmillan.
  2. Ryan, M.-L. (2015).Narrative as virtual reality 2: Revisiting immersion and interactivity in literature and electronic media. Johns Hopkins University Press.
  3. Genette, G. (1980).Narrative discourse: An essay in method(J. E. Lewin, Trans.). Cornell University Press.
  4. Bordwell, D. (1985).Narration in the fiction film. University of Wisconsin Press.
  5. Chatman, S. (1978).Story and discourse: Narrative structure in fiction and film. Cornell University Press.
  6. Ryan, M.-L. (2006).Avatars of story. University of Minnesota Press.
  7. Milgram, P., & Kishino, F. (1994). A taxonomy of mixed reality visual displays.IEICE Transactions on Information and Systems, E77-D(12), 1321–1329.
  8. Dooley, K. (2024). A case study of VR story development: Fire Escape (2019). In K. Dooley & A. Munt (Eds.),Screenwriting for virtual reality(pp. 179–204). Palgrave Macmillan.
  9. Weaving, S. (2021). Evoke, don't show: Narration in cinematic virtual reality and the making of Entangled.Virtual Creativity, 11(1), 53–66.
  10. Williams, E. R., Love, C., & Love, M. (2021).Virtual reality cinema: Narrative tips and techniques. Routledge.
  11. Berger, E. (Director). (2024).Submerged[Immersive short film]. Apple Vision Pro.
  12. Iñárritu, A. G. (Director). (2017).Carne y Arena[VR installation]. Legendary Entertainment / Fondazione Prada.
  13. Stapleton, C., & Mott, D. (2008). Making memories: Linear versus interactive storytelling collaboration in mixed reality space.Proceedings of the International Conference on Advances in Computer Entertainment Technology.
  14. Dionysus, A. (2021). Storytelling in a frameless screen: Screenwriting for VR and AR at Pentridge Heritage Precinct.TEXT Special Issue, 62, 1–18.