Communications in Humanities Research ISSN: 2753-7072
Home> Volumes> Volume CHR Vol.117> Article
Research Article

Mediated Accountability Beyond the Domestic/Global Divide: A Relational Analysis of Gender-Based Violence Reform in India and South Korea

Wanyi LiuAnnie Wright School*

* Corresponding author: [email protected]

Abstract

This article examines how media contribute to state accountability after highly visible cases of gender-based violence. Rather than treating domestic and global media, or media and the state, as separate actors that exert pressure across fixed boundaries, it develops a relational non-dualistic framework. Drawing on agential realism, framing theory, and accountability scholarship, the article conceptualises legal reform as an outcome produced through interactions among journalists, activists, digital platforms, publics, courts, and governments. A comparative qualitative analysis of the 2012 Nirbhaya case in India and the 2018–2020 Nth Room case in South Korea identifies four mechanisms: making harm publicly governable, translating claims across scales, inscribing crisis into law, and closing controversy through symbolic reform. The comparison shows that media influence was substantial in accelerating legal responses but conditional on the architecture of civil society networks and institutional receptivity. India's response was organised around mass protest, a highly personalised national symbol, and contested transnational representation; South Korea's response relied more heavily on investigative coalitions, platform evidence, and petition infrastructures. In both cases, legal change restored a measure of legitimacy while leaving implementation gaps and structural gender inequality intact. Media therefore function less as an external watchdog than as part of the socio-legal relations through which accountability becomes visible, demandable, and temporarily institutionalised.

Keywords: Gender-Based Violence; Media; State Legitimacy; Accountability; Non-Dualism
Published: September 1, 2026
DOI: 10.54254/2753-7064/2026.36383
Volume: CHR Vol.117
pp. 81-87
Download PDF

References

  1. Barad, K. (2003). Posthumanist performativity: Toward an understanding of how matter comes to matter.Signs, 28(3), 801–831. https://doi.org/10.1086/345321
  2. McCombs, M. E., & Shaw, D. L. (1972). The agenda-setting function of mass media.Public Opinion Quarterly, 36(2), 176–187. https://doi.org/10.1086/267990
  3. Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm.Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x
  4. Merry, S. E. (2006). Transnational human rights and local activism: Mapping the middle.American Anthropologist, 108(1), 38–51. https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.2006.108.1.38
  5. Bennett, W. L., & Segerberg, A. (2012). The logic of connective action: Digital media and the personalization of contentious politics.Information, Communication & Society, 15(5), 739–768. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2012.670661
  6. Bovens, M. (2007). Analysing and assessing accountability: A conceptual framework.European Law Journal, 13(4), 447–468. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0386.2007.00378.x
  7. Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches.Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571–610. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1995.9508080331
  8. Birkland, T. A. (1998). Focusing events, mobilization, and agenda setting.Journal of Public Policy, 18(1), 53–74. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0143814X98000038
  9. Phillips, M., Mostofian, F., Jetly, R., Puthukudy, N., Madden, K., & Bhandari, M. (2015). Media coverage of violence against women in India: A systematic study of a high-profile rape case.BMC Women's Health, 15, 3. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-015-0161-x
  10. Rajan, B., Kundu, D., & Sarkar, S. (2025). Rape, popular culture, and Nirbhaya: A study of India's Daughter and Delhi Crime.Journal of Communication Inquiry, 49(2), 196–214. https://doi.org/10.1177/01968599221102527
  11. Jun, W. C. (2022). A study on characteristics analysis and countermeasures of digital sex crimes in Korea.International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(1), 12. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19010012
  12. Jun, W. C. (2023). A study on the analysis of and educational solution for digital sex crimes in Korea.International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(3), 2450. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20032450
  13. Kim, J. (2021). The resurgence and popularization of feminism in South Korea: Key issues and challenges for contemporary feminist activism.Korea Journal, 61(4), 75-101. doi:10.25024/kj.2021.61.4.75.
  14. Kim, K., & Suh, C. S. (2024). Mobilizing grievances in the internet age: The case of national online petitioning in South Korea, 2017-2022.PLoS One, 19(5), e0302373. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0302373.
  15. Bandewar, S. V., Pitre, A., & Lingam, L. (2018). Five years post Nirbhaya: Critical insights into the status of response to sexual assault.Indian Journal of Medical Ethics, 3(3), 215-221. doi:10.20529/IJME.2018.025.
  16. Cherukuri, S. (2021). Sexual violence against women, the laws, the punishment, and negotiating the duplicity.Laws, 10(2), 27. doi:10.3390/laws10020027.
  17. Kim, H. (2023). The current state and legal issues of online crimes related to children and adolescents.Journal of the Korean Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 34(4), 222-228. doi:10.5765/jkacap.230049.
  18. Kim, S., Choi, E., & Champion, J. D. (2024). Technology-facilitated sexual violence in South Korea: A content analysis of a website for victims.Violence Against Women, 30(11), 3077-3090. doi:10.1177/10778012231172712.