Research Article

Critical Comparative Study of Equity-Oriented Educational Leadership Practices in Multicultural Contexts

Chanjuan ZhouHenan Polytechnic University*

* Corresponding author: [email protected]

Abstract

The current study focuses on equity-oriented educational leadership amid multicultural school environment using a comparative critical approach. Six primary and secondary schools situated within one metropolitan region, which comprised over 30% of ethnically, linguistically, and economically different students, were chosen for investigation. Data were gathered from school administrators, middle-level managers, teachers, students, documents, and observations in classrooms. Four areas were considered while assessing the efficiency of the leadership: distributive equity, cultural recognition, participatory engagement, and discrimination management. Qualitative data were analyzed by utilizing NVivo 14 software together with SPSS 29 and Excel. Simulation experiment results showed that those schools demonstrating better harmony between leadership style, policy, and actions demonstrated a significantly higher level of equity leadership (4.05 ± 0.26) compared to the schools with low levels of harmony (3.21 ± 0.39). Furthermore, a higher self-efficacy rate among teachers was recorded at schools with good harmony (4.12 ± 0.31) in comparison with poor harmony ones (3.37 ± 0.42). Greatest difference was found in distributive equity and discrimination management.

Keywords: Educational leadership; equity-oriented leadership; multicultural education; school management; educational equity
Published: August 24, 2026
DOI: 10.54254/2753-7064/2026.36353
Volume: CHR Vol.117
pp. 75-80
Download PDF

References

  1. Mansfield, K. C. (2024). Culturally responsive leadership: A critical analysis of one district's plan.Frontiers in Education, 9, 1385788.
  2. Brady, L. M., Fryberg, S. A., & Shoda, Y. (2024). A leadership-level culture cycle intervention changes teachers' cultural beliefs and practices and students' academic experiences.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 121(25), e2322876121.
  3. Leer, J., et al. (2024). School diversity ideologies and adolescent mental health and academic adjustment.Child Development, 95(6), 1672–1689.
  4. Mapp, K. L., & Bergman, E. (2021). Embracing a new normal: Toward a more liberatory approach to family engagement.Carnegie Corporation of New York.
  5. Holquist, S. E., Mitra, D. L., Conner, J. O., & Wright, N. L. (2023). What is student voice anyway? The intersection of student voice practices and shared leadership.Educational Administration Quarterly, 59(4), 703–743.
  6. McMillan, M. (2021). An examination of the related literature for inclusive school leadership.Journal of Educational Leadership and Policy Studies, 5(2), 1–18.
  7. UNESCO. (2026).Lead to include: Educational leadership for inclusive education. UNESCO.
  8. Banks, J. (2025). Culturally responsive family engagement.TEACHING Exceptional Children, 57(4), 288–293.
  9. Genao, S. (2021). Doing it for culturally responsive school leadership: Utilizing reflexivity from preparation to practice.Journal of Research on Leadership Education, 16(2), 158–170.
  10. European Agency for Special Needs and Inclusive Education. (2021).Supporting inclusive school leadership: Policy messages. European Agency for Special Needs and Inclusive Education.