Research Article

Comparative Analysis of Small House System in Hong Kong and Rural Homestead System in Mainland China

Bentai YuHunan Institute of Finance and Economics*

* Corresponding author: [email protected]

Abstract

From the perspective of jurisprudence and the starting point of land rights, this paper compares the small house system in Hong Kong with the rural homestead system in the mainland, and finds that there are differences in the nature of rights, the dimension of fairness, efficiency and resource allocation between the two; At the same time, there are many aspects of the mainland homestead system that are actually worthy of reference for the Hong Kong small house system, which can provide a reference for the system improvement of the Hong Kong small house system to resolve the gender equality disputes, inefficient and idle land and other problems caused by the exclusive use of men. Based on these understandings, the article tries to put forward some enlightenment of the mainland experience to the small house system, such as learning from the practical path of the reform of "separation of powers", or exploring the method of balancing the relationship between the protection of historical rights and interests and the construction of the rule of law, to provide theoretical support and practical reference for the reform of the small house system in Hong Kong.

Keywords: Hong Kong small house system; rural homestead system in the mainland; jurisprudence; land rights; system comparison
Published: August 24, 2026
DOI: 10.54254/2753-7064/2026.36269
Volume: CHR Vol.120
pp. 45-52
Download PDF

References

  1. Yau, Y., & Lee, S. H. (2016). Sustainable development and social policy: A case of indigenous villages in Hong Kong.International Journal of Sustainable Development, 5(3), 305–317.
  2. Li, T. W. (2018). Colonial history, indigenous villages' rights, and rural land use: An empirical study of planning control decisions on small house applications in Hong Kong.Land Use Policy, 72, 341–353.
  3. Lee, W. Y. H. (2003). A study of the small house policy in Hong Kong.
  4. Fung, P. S. S., & Lee, A. S. M. (2014). History of land registration and small house policies in the New Territories of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, the People's Republic of China.Journal of the Hong Kong Institute of Land Administration, 12(1), 15–28.
  5. Chiu, M. C. (2006). Negotiating Han-Chinese legal culture: Post-colonial gender political discourse on Hong Kong's small house policy.King's College Law Journal, 17(1), 45–69.
  6. School of Architecture, The Chinese University of Hong Kong. (2023).New territories tomorrow: An urban design vision for Hong Kong's rural-urban interface. Hong Kong: CUHK Press.
  7. Lu, S. Y. (2026). Women's rights under the small house policy in Hong Kong.Gender & History, 38(1), 370–389.
  8. Mao, C., & Cao, Y. X. (2024). Review and prospect of rural homestead system reform research.Journal of South-Central University for Nationalities (Humanities and Social Sciences Edition), 44(4), 143–151.
  9. Xi, Z. G. (2022). On the jurisprudential basis and rights allocation of the "three rights" separation of homestead land—from the perspective of preventing rural conflicts and resolving disputes.Administrative Management Reform(3), 69–79.
  10. Yuan, P. (2022). Historical evolution and deepening reform of the "qualification right" system for homestead land.Reform(4), 21–32.