Communications in Humanities Research ISSN: 2753-7072
Home> Volumes> Volume CHR Vol.119> Article
Research Article

Beyond the Transparency Paradox: Contextual AI Disclosure and User Trust on Chinese Digital Platforms

Yiyu PanNew York University*

* Corresponding author: [email protected]

Abstract

This study explores how varying degrees of disclosure of artificial intelligence information affect users' trust and behavioral intentions on Chinese digital platforms. Based on recent controlled experiments, eye-tracking research, and statistics, this paper finds that the disclosure of artificial intelligence information can have a double-edged effect, depending on the specific situation. In utilitarian situations such as advertising and product search, information disclosure tends to improve user trust and perceived credibility. In social and hedonic situations, information disclosure tends to reduce user engagement and weaken the connection between users and content. Mechanism analysis shows that the driving factors of this pattern include: first, users' attribution bias toward errors labeled as AI-generated. Second, the increase in effectiveness and discomfort after information disclosure, and finally, the non-linear relationship between the level of information disclosure detail and trust. These mechanisms vary depending on the platform type, product type, and the user's artificial intelligence literacy. Based on these findings, this study proposes a three-part governance framework: a tiered information disclosure system, traceable records that meet the current regulatory requirements, and a human-in-the-loop design for high-sensitivity interactions. The framework challenges a common assumption that more information is better in artificial intelligence information disclosure. On the contrary, it adopts a different approach - a situation-oriented approach. The goal is to achieve a balance among transparency, user trust, and user participation on digital platforms.

Keywords: AI Transparency; Algorithm Aversion; Contextual Disclosure; User Engagement; Digital Platform Governance
Published: August 18, 2026
DOI: 10.54254/2753-7064/2026.BJ36227
Volume: CHR Vol.119
pp. 1-9
Download PDF

References

  1. China Internet Network Information Center. (2024, May 9). The 53rd statistical report on China's internet development. Retrieved July 23, 2026, from https://www.cnnic.com.cn/IDR/ReportDownloads/202405/P020240509518443205347.pdf
  2. State Council Information Office of the People's Republic of China. (2025, April 9). 346 generative AI services filed with Cyberspace Administration of China. Retrieved July 23, 2026, from http://english.scio.gov.cn/pressroom/2025-04/09/content_117814020.html
  3. Dietvorst, B. J., Simmons, J. P., & Massey, C. (2015). Algorithm aversion: People erroneously avoid algorithms after seeing them err.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 144(1), 114–126. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000033
  4. Longoni, C., Bonezzi, A., & Morewedge, C. K. (2019). Resistance to medical artificial intelligence.Journal of Consumer Research, 46(4), 629–650. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcr/ucz013
  5. Laupichler, M. C., Knoth, N., Schleiss, J., & Raupach, T. (2025). Algorithm aversion revisited: The role of AI literacy and attitudes towards AI in shaping perceptions of AI-generated texts.British Journal of Educational Technology. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.70035
  6. Glikson, E., & Woolley, A. W. (2020). Human trust in artificial intelligence: Review of empirical research.Academy of Management Annals, 14(2), 627–660. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2018.0057
  7. Do, T., Pham, T.-Q.-A., Liao, Y.-K., Huang, K.-C., & Wu, W.-Y. (2026). Transparency disclosure mechanisms for AI-generated advertising on online platforms: An empirical study of user trust and engagement.Internet Technology Letters. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1002/itl2.70354
  8. Ma, T., Du, Y., Wang, Y., & Zhou, L. (2026). Strategic disclosure of AI curation: A boundary condition on algorithm aversion in hedonic e-commerce.Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 21(7), Article 232. https://doi.org/10.3390/jtaer21070232
  9. Gao, X., Li, W., & Zhao, Y. (2026). AI-generated marketing content value and disclosure: How functional and hedonic appeals shape customer engagement.Frontiers in Psychology, 16, Article 1701085. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1701085
  10. Chen, N., Lai, Z., Liu, Y., Li, J., Wang, R., & Yan, P. (2026). How AI disclosure shapes high school students' trust.Information Research, 31(iConf). https://doi.org/10.47989/ir31iConf64165
  11. Wang, R., Jia, B., & Yan, P. (2025). "Saying is believing": Exploring the importance of AI-generated content disclosure and user trust.Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 62(1). https://doi.org/10.1002/pra2.1295
  12. Weller, A., Zerilli, J., & Bhatt, U. (2022). How transparency modulates trust in artificial intelligence.Patterns, 3(2), Article 100455. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patter.2022.100455
  13. Yu, L., & Li, Y. (2022). Artificial intelligence decision-making transparency and employees' trust: The parallel multiple mediating effect of effectiveness and discomfort.Behavioral Sciences, 12(5), Article 127. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs12050127
  14. Xiao, Y., Du, J., Ding, Y., Zhang, M., Jiang, Y., Yang, Y., & Liu, J. (2026). AI-generated content disclosure and prolonged short-video engagement: A heuristic-systematic risk-trust model among late-adolescent and emerging-adult TikTok users.Behavioral Sciences, 16(7), Article 1179. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs16071179
  15. Cyberspace Administration of China, Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, Ministry of Public Security, & State Administration of Radio and Television. (2025, March 14). Measures for labeling of AI-generated synthetic content. Retrieved July 27, 2026, from https://www.cac.gov.cn/2025-03/14/c_1743654684782215.html