Research Article

Learning Under Pressure: Emotional Cultures and Student Participation in Shanghai Secondary Schools

Sumei ZhangUniversity of Shanghai for Science and Technology*

* Corresponding author: [email protected]

Abstract

Shanghai is a well-known high-achieving educational environment in which students' academic performance is shaped by fierce competition, examination pressure, family expectations, and institutional demands. Much existing research has focused on achievement, stress, and mental health in schooling, while the role of emotions in classroom participation has received less attention. This conceptual study looks at how emotional cultures influence student participation in Shanghai secondary schools. Drawing on the sociology of emotions, school climate, and student agency, it contends that involvement is not only cognitive and behavioral, but also emotionally and socially positioned. Students in high-performing school environments are frequently required to be self-disciplined, efficient, resilient, modest, competitive, and emotionally stable. These expectations may help students succeed, but they may also limit their desire to ask questions, demonstrate confusion, express reluctance, and participate in open classroom engagement. Based on educational observations and socio-cultural research, this paper contends that emotional cultures manage involvement through relational safety, perceived exposure risk, and internalised achievement pressure. Emotional culture should thus be viewed as a structural prerequisite of learning and involvement, rather than as a secondary or purely individual concern.

Keywords: emotional culture; student participation; agency; school climate; Shanghai secondary education
Published: July 14, 2026
DOI: 10.54254/2753-7064/2026.35359
Volume: CHR Vol.116
pp. 102-111
Download PDF

References

  1. OECD. (2010).PISA 2009 results: What students know and can do: Student performance in reading, mathematics and science, Volume I. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264091450-en
  2. OECD. (2014).PISA 2012 results: What students know and can do: Student performance in mathematics, reading and science, Volume I, revised edition. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264208780-en
  3. Kools, M., & Stoll, L. (2016).What makes a school a learning organisation?OECD Education Working Papers, No. 137. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/5jlwm62b3bvh-en
  4. Sliwka, A., & Klopsch, B. (2020).School development in the 21st century: Governance, leadership and learning cultures. Heidelberg University Press.
  5. Sliwka, A., Klopsch, B., Beigel, J., & Tung, L. (2024). Transformational leadership for deeper learning: Shaping innovative school practices for enhanced learning.Journal of Educational Administration, 62(1), 103–121. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEA-03-2023-0049
  6. Mesquita, B., Boiger, M., & De Leersnyder, J. (2016). The cultural construction of emotions.Current Opinion in Psychology, 8, 31–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2015.09.015
  7. Przybylska, I. (2021). Emotional culture as a context of education: Why emotional culture is important for pedagogy?Kultura i Edukacja, 4(134), 89–104. https://doi.org/10.15804/kie.2021.04.06
  8. Reay, D. (2000). A useful extension of Bourdieu's conceptual framework? Emotional capital as a way of understanding mothers' involvement in their children's education.The Sociological Review, 48(4), 568–585. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-954X.00233
  9. Zembylas, M. (2020). Emotional capital and education: Theoretical insights from Bourdieu. In M. Murphy & C. Costa (Eds.),Bourdieu and education(pp. 41–61). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429053420-4
  10. Hochschild, A. R. (1983).The managed heart: Commercialization of human feeling. University of California Press.
  11. Mainhard, T., Oudman, S., Hornstra, L., Bosker, R. J., & Goetz, T. (2018). Student emotions in class: The relative importance of teachers and their interpersonal relations with students.Learning and Instruction, 53, 109–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2017.07.011
  12. Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. Richardson (Ed.),Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education(pp. 241–258). Greenwood.
  13. Yin, H.-B., Lee, J. C.-K., Zhang, Z.-H., & Jin, Y.-L. (2013). Exploring the relationship among teachers' emotional intelligence, emotional labor strategies and teaching satisfaction.Teaching and Teacher Education, 35, 137–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2013.06.006
  14. Heenan, I. W., De Paor, D., Lafferty, N., & Mannix McNamara, P. (2023). The impact of transformational school leadership on school staff and school culture in primary schools: A systematic review of international literature.Societies, 13(6), 133. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc13060133
  15. Gorski, P. (2016). Rethinking the role of culture in educational equity: From cultural competence to equity literacy.Multicultural Perspectives, 18(4), 221–226. https://doi.org/10.1080/15210960.2016.1222288
  16. Kennedy, K. (2019). Centering equity and caring in leadership for social-emotional learning: Toward a conceptual framework for diverse learners.Journal of School Leadership, 29(6), 473–492. https://doi.org/10.1177/1052684619843924
  17. McCall, C. S., Romero, M. E., Yang, W., & Weigand, T. (2023). A call for equity-focused social-emotional learning.School Psychology Review, 52(5), 586–607. https://doi.org/10.1080/2372966X.2023.2172454
  18. Dervin, F. (2016).Interculturality in education: A theoretical and methodological toolbox. Palgrave Macmillan.
  19. Dervin, F. (2024).Interculturologies: Moving forward with interculturality in research and education. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-7023-4
  20. Reyes, J. A., Elias, M. J., Parker, S. J., & Rosenblatt, J. L. (2012). Promoting educational equity in disadvantaged youth: The role of resilience and social-emotional learning. In S. Goldstein & R. B. Brooks (Eds.),Handbook of resilience in children(pp. 349–370). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3661-4_20