Research Article

Immobility Behind Mobility: The Cultural Discount Problem Faced by Chinese Intangible Cultural Heritage in the Process of Commodification and Cross-Cultural Communication

Lizhi FanSoochow University*

* Corresponding author: [email protected]

Abstract

As an important carrier of cultural exports, China's intangible cultural heritage faces commodification challenges and cross-cultural understanding barriers in its globalization process. This paper takes Xiu Niang Silk, a local Suzhou embroidery workshop, as a case study, using fieldwork to analyze the current situation and causes of cultural discount among Chinese intangible cultural heritage products in cross-cultural circulation. The study finds that Chinese cultural products in global circulation the process of globalized circulation are jointly hindered by external hegemony and internal limitations, forming an "imagined line" that enables Chinese cultural products to achieve physical mobility while their cultural connotations remain difficult to reach audiences from different cultural backgrounds. This paper argues that resolving this dilemma requires a shift from external critique to internal–external coordination, and, on the premise of maintaining cultural subjectivity, the realization of a transformation from "passive accommodation" to "active dialogue" by improving institutional guarantees, cultivating cultural intermediaries, and building multi-layered communication systems.

Keywords: cultural discount; Orientalism; the imagined line; Suzhou embroidery; cross-cultural communication
Published: June 23, 2026
DOI: 10.54254/2753-7064/2026.BJ34617
Volume: CHR Vol.114
pp. 35-41
Download PDF

References

  1. Said, E. W. (1978). Orientalism. Pantheon Books.
  2. Hoskins, C., & Mirus, R. (1988). Reasons for the US dominance of the international trade in television programmes. Media, Culture & Society, 10(4), 499-515.
  3. Nye, J. S. (2004). Soft Power: The Means to Success in World Politics. PublicAffairs.
  4. Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture's Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions and Organizations Across Nations (2nd ed.). Sage Publications.
  5. Azoulay, A., & Ophir, A. (2005). The imagined line: On the figure of the border in the context of the Israeli occupation. In The Power of Inclusive Exclusion: Anatomy of Israeli Rule in Occupied Palestine (pp. 303-329). Zone Books.
  6. Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. Vintage Books.
  7. Kurin, R. (2004). Safeguarding intangible cultural heritage in the 2003 UNESCO Convention: A critical appraisal. Museum International, 56(1-2), 66-77.
  8. Smith, L., & Akagawa, N. (Eds.). (2019). Intangible Heritage (2nd ed.). Routledge.
  9. Kirshenblatt-Gimblett, B. (2004). Intangible heritage as metacultural production. Museum International, 56(1-2), 52-65.
  10. Wang, J. (2006). Localizing Chinese Soft Power: The Role of Media. Working Paper, USC Center on Public Diplomacy.
  11. Ang, I. (2011). Unfinished agenda: Theorizing cultural hybridity. Routledge.
  12. Pine, B. J., & Gilmore, J. H. (2011). The Experience Economy: Updated Edition. Harvard Business Review Press.
  13. Kim, S., Kim, S., & Park, J. (2022). The impact of heritage tourism experience on cultural understanding and behavioral intentions. Tourism Management Perspectives, 42, 100987.