Research Article

Pragmatic Marker Functions of Sentence-Final Parentheses in High-Context Online Communication Patterns

Jiayi HeJiangsu University*

* Corresponding author: [email protected]

Abstract

With the popularization of online social media, a linguistic phenomenon has emerged in Chinese online contexts where parentheses are appended to the end of sentences, which may contain text or remain blank. As a pragmatic marker, sentence-final parentheses primarily undertake two major functions: basic information compensation and upper-level pragmatic adjustment. They compensate for the lack of paralinguistic information in pure text communication and adapt to the communicative needs of face maintenance and emotional expression in China's high-context culture. The popularity of sentence-final parentheses reflects the self-adjustment of language itself to adapt to the new media environment, as well as the deep pursuit of emotional connection by online communities in virtual spaces.

Keywords: sentence-final parentheses; high-context culture; online communication; pragmatic markers
Published: June 15, 2026
DOI: 10.54254/2753-7064/2026.34442
Volume: CHR Vol.111
pp. 165-172
Download PDF

References

  1. Feng, G. W. (2004). Semantic and pragmatic analysis of Chinese pragmatic markers. Modern Foreign Languages, (1).
  2. Lü, S. X. (2013). Lectures on grammar and rhetoric (p. 311). The Commercial Press.
  3. Wang, X. J. (1996). On linguistic context. Journal of Guangxi University (Philosophy and Social Science Edition), (1).
  4. Hall, E. (2010). Beyond culture (D. K. He, Trans., p. 82). Peking University Press.
  5. Cheng, M. L. (2013). What is "new media context"? Journalism & Writing, (8).
  6. Verschueren, J. (2003). Understanding pragmatics (G. L. Qian, Trans., pp. 217-219). Tsinghua University Press.
  7. Zhang, Y., Zhang, L., Ren, W., & Liu, Y. (2024). "(scream)(wriggle)(dismally crawl)"–parentheses as semiotic resources for translanguaging and trans-semiotic practices on Chinese micro-blogging. Social Semiotics, 1-18.
  8. Yao, Q., Ma, H. W., Yan, H., et al. (2014). Analysis of individual behaviors of social network users from a psychological perspective. Advances in Psychological Science, (10).
  9. Li, J., & Song, Y. N. (2004). A study on face theory in Chinese culture. Rhetoric Learning, (2).
  10. Sun, Y., & Dai, L. (2002). Studies on pragmatic failure in China. Foreign Languages and Their Teaching, (3).
  11. Stalin. (1953). Marxism and problems of linguistics (p. 20). People's Press.
  12. Chen, Y. M. (2008). Interpretation of internet buzzwords from a linguistic perspective. Journal of Central South University of Forestry and Technology (Social Sciences), (6).
  13. Berger, C. R., & Calabrese, R. J. (1975). Some explorations in initial interactions and beyond: Toward a developmental theory of interpersonal communication. Human Communication Research, 1, 99-112.
  14. Dong, C. Y., & Ding, Y. R. (2018). Lean media, rich usage: Emotional compensation in internet-mediated communication. Journalism & Writing, (9).