Research Article
A Comparative Study of Suffering Writing from the Perspective of Polyphonic Narration — Taking To Live and The Field of Life and Death as Examples
Abstract
Based on Bakhtin's polyphonic narration theory as the core framework, this paper analyzes and compares the different forms of suffering writing reflected by the multi-voice narration in To Live and The Field of Life and Death. To Live highlights the "irresistibility" of suffering through "monologic polyphony", triggering reflections on the meaning of individual existence; The Field of Life and Death shows the "collectivity" and "historicity" of suffering through "heteroglossic polyphony", inspiring concern for the fate of the nation. As classic texts of suffering literature, both works structure their narratives with polyphonic multi-voice techniques, presenting a real and powerful Chinese folk society that resists suffering.
Keywords: polyphony; suffering; To Live; The Field of Life and Death
References
- Bakhtin. Problems of Dostoevsky's Poetics. World Literature, 1982(4).
- Li Hong. A Comparison of Polyphony between The New Year's Sacrifice and To Live. Dongjiang Journal, 2004(04): 78-80.
- Percy Lubbock. The Craft of Fiction. New York: The Viking Press, 1957, p.251.
- Liu Yanhui. On the Classification of Narrators in Dramatic Texts — Also on the Deficiencies of Brian Richardson's Classification of Dramatic Narrators. Journal of Shanghai Normal University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2024, 53(03): 60-69.
- Chen Sihe. Folk Tragedy from the Perspective of Enlightenment: The Field of Life and Death. Journal of Tianjin Normal University (Social Sciences Edition), 2004(01): 46-55.
- Chen Hongming, Ding Xiuping. The Art of Polyphony in The Biography of Hulan River and The Field of Life and Death. Journal of Shaoxing University (Humanities and Social Sciences), 2018, 38(05): 66-71.