Communications in Humanities Research ISSN: 2753-7072
Home> Volumes> Volume CHR Vol.105> Article
Research Article

The Adverse Effects of Utilisation of AI-Generated Content by Older Adults: A Scoping Analysis of Distribution Channels, Vulnerabilities, and Countermeasures

Yuhan TangBeijing University of Chemical Technology*

* Corresponding author: [email protected]

Abstract

The application of generative AI technology in the creation of videos and audio contents increases its spread rate but also increases chances that fabricated information will mislead public opinions when not rigorously verified; Simultaneously it makes illegal activities easier as identity is stolen or abused for different purposes within massive scale without being easily detected. Driven by gaps in digital literacy, verification habits and social-psychological needs, older people are more likely to fall victim to fake media on short-video apps, social networks and other peer-to-peer channels. At the same time, this phenomenon also leads to financial losses for parents; it harms the mental state or physical safety of children; and disrupts the consistency of daily routines and development activities. The current mitigation tactics are mainly clustered at four levels: personal digital literacy education, family-based intergenerational assistance, platform-content regulation, and regulatory collaboration. However, it is still necessary to consider the extent of its influence in practice and how much evidence there is to back it up currently. Based on the research results, this article constructs a unified "technology-cognition-behaviour" framework and puts forward concrete recommendations for families in China, internet platforms, and the general public.

Keywords: AI-generated content; deepfakes; voice cloning; misinformation; older adults
Published: April 13, 2026
DOI: 10.54254/2753-7064/2026.BJ32742
Volume: CHR Vol.105
pp. 194-203
Download PDF

References

  1. Mehta, P., Jagatap, G., Gallagher, K., Timmerman, B., Deb, P., Garg, S., ... & Dolan-Gavitt, B. (2023). Can deepfakes be created by novice users?.  arXiv preprint arXiv: 2304.14576. [21]Patel, N., Jain, R., & Mathew, G. J. (2025). Unveiling the Influence of Misinformation and Deceptive AI-Generated Content on Gen Z: A Comprehensive Study.  Advances in Consumer Research,   2(3).
  2. Marchal, N., Xu, R., Elasmar, R., Gabriel, I., Goldberg, B., & Isaac, W. (2024). Generative AI misuse: A taxonomy of tactics and insights from real-world data.  arXiv preprint arXiv: 2406.13843.
  3. Kang, F., Cao, Y., & Chen, H. (2025). Face2VoiceSync: Lightweight Face-Voice Consistency for Text-Driven Talking Face Generation.  arXiv preprint arXiv: 2507.19225.
  4. Yu, L., Mottola, G., Kieffer, C. N., Mascio, R., Valdes, O., Bennett, D. A., & Boyle, P. A. (2023). Vulnerability of older adults to government impersonation scams. JAMA Network Open, 6(9), e2335319-e2335319.
  5. Corsi, G. (2024). Evaluating Twitter's algorithmic amplification of low-credibility content: an observational study. EPJ Data Science, 13(1), 1-15.
  6. Yunita, N., Juhana, A., & Sari, I. P. (2025). Enhancing digital literacy in the elderly through media and technology to prevent hoaxes in Indonesia: A systematic literature review. Literasi: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 16(1), 87-101.
  7. Majerczak, P., & Strzelecki, A. (2022). Trust, media credibility, social ties, and the intention to share towards information verification in an age of fake news. Behavioral Sciences, 12(2), 51.
  8. Gu, C., Li, X., & Xiang, Q. (2025). The infinite monkey theorem in AIGC advertising: Matching effects between AI disclosure and advertising appeals on consumer advertising avoidance intention. Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing, 1-20.
  9. Al-Khazraji, S. H., Saleh, H. H., Khalid, A. I., & Mishkhal, I. A. (2023). Impact of deepfake technology on social media: Detection, misinformation and societal implications. The Eurasia Proceedings of Science Technology Engineering and Mathematics, 23(429-441), 2.
  10. Ye, Z., Zou, X., Post, T., Mo, W., & Yang, Q. (2022). Too old to plan? Age identity and financial planning among the older population of China. China Economic Review, 73, 101770.
  11. Mak, S., & Thomas, A. (2022). Steps for conducting a scoping review. Journal of graduate medical education, 14(5), 565-567.
  12. Kaur, A., Noori Hoshyar, A., Saikrishna, V., Firmin, S., & Xia, F. (2024). Deepfake video detection: challenges and opportunities. Artificial Intelligence Review, 57(6), 159.
  13. Wang, K., Chen, M., Lu, L., Feng, J., Chen, Q., Ba, Z., ... and Chen, C. (2025, May) One borrowed phrase: Evaluate the risks of voice synthesis in the AIGC period. In 2025 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP): pp. (4663-4681). IEEE is an academic community.
  14. Zhang, Y., Song, W., Koura, Y. H., & Su, Y. (2023). Social bots and information propagation in social networks: Simulating cooperative and competitive interaction dynamics. Systems, 11(4), 210.
  15. Spasova, L. (2025). Susceptibility to authority figures in advertising with persuasive strategies–age differences in perception. Business & Management Compass, 69(3), 33-47.
  16. Narayanan, A. (2023). Understanding social media recommendation algorithms.
  17. Pathak, R., Spezzano, F., & Pera, M. S. (2023). Understanding the contribution of recommendation algorithms on misinformation recommendation and misinformation dissemination on social networks. ACM Transactions on the Web, 17(4), 1-26.
  18. José-Cabezudo, R. S., & Camarero-Izquierdo, C. (2012). Determinants of opening-forwarding e-mail messages. Journal of Advertising, 41(2), 97-112.
  19. Cui, S., Zhao, Y., & Qie, R. (2025). Who needs What Support? Exploring the relationship between intergenerational support and digital media use among Chinese older adults: A latent profile analysis. Computers in Human Behavior, 164, 108506.
  20. Ueno, D., Arakawa, M., Fujii, Y., Amano, S., Kato, Y., Matsuoka, T., & Narumoto, J. (2022). Psychosocial characteristics of victims of special fraud among Japanese older adults: A cross-sectional study using scam vulnerability scale. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 960442.
  21. Kemp, S., & Erades Pérez, N. (2023). Consumer fraud against older adults in digital society: Examining victimization and its impact. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(7), 5404.
  22. Zhou, J., Xiang, H., & Xie, B. (2023). Better safe than sorry: a study on older adults' credibility judgments and spreading of health misinformation. Universal Access in the Information Society, 22(3), 957-966.
  23. Ecker, P. A. (2025). The Digital Reinforcement of Bias and Belief: Understanding the Cognitive and Social Impact of Web-Based Information Processing. Springer Nature.
  24. Choudhary, H., & Bansal, N. (2022). Addressing digital divide through digital literacy training programs: A systematic literature review. Digital Education Review, (41), 224-248.
  25. Siapera, E. (2022). Platform governance and the "infodemic". Javnost-The Public, 29(2), 197-214.
  26. Rebovich, D., & Corbo, L. (2022). The distillation of national crime data into a plan for elderly fraud prevention: A quantitative and qualitative analysis of US postal inspection service cases of fraud against the elderly. In The new technology of financial crime (pp. 126-149). Routledge.