L1 Phonetic Transfer in French-Accented English: A Review of Segmental and Prosodic Features
Abstract
In the context of the normalization of international communication and the widespread teaching of second foreign languages, the causes of English accents in native French speakers have become a key research area in the field of phonetics. Existing studies show that mother tongue transfer, as the core cause of second-language accent formation, is closely linked to specific phonetic differences between English and French. This study, based on a review paradigm, systematically outlines the core phonetic differences between French and English in terms of vowels, consonants, and stress-rhythm systems. It integrates relevant findings from existing empirical research on the negative transfer of mother tongue phonetic habits and attempts to provide theoretical support for second-language phonetic instruction. The goal is to help optimize English pronunciation training programs for native French speakers, improve the research framework on cross-linguistic phonetic transfer, and offer directions for future empirical research.
References
- Jiao. (2025). A study on English phonetic acquisition of non-English majors based on experimental phonetics and language transfer theory. Qingzhi, 2025(1). https: //link.cnki.net/doi/10.20122/j.cnki.2097-0536.2025.01.028 [in Chinese]
- Kolly, M.-J., & Dellwo, V. (2014). Cues to linguistic origin: The contribution of speech temporal information to foreign accent recognition. Journal of Phonetics, 42, 12–23. https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2013.11.004
- Kartushina, N., & Martin, C. D. (2019). Third-language learning affects bilinguals' production in both their native languages: A longitudinal study of dynamic changes in L1, L2, and L3 vowel production. Journal of Phonetics, 77, 100920. https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2019.100920
- Smith, C. L., Erickson, D., & Savariaux, C. (2019). Articulatory and acoustic correlates of prominence in French: Comparing L1 and L2 speakers. Journal of Phonetics, 77, 100938. https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2019.100938
- Vieru, B., De Mareüil, P. B., & Adda-Decker, M. (2011). Characterisation and identification of non-native French accents. Speech Communication, 53(3), 292–310. https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.specom.2010.10.002
- Chang, C. B. (2012). Rapid and multifaceted effects of second-language learning on first-language speech production. Journal of Phonetics, 40(2), 249–268. https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2011.10.007
- Hutchinson, A. E., & Dmitrieva, O. (2022). Exposure to speech via foreign film and its effects on non-native vowel production and perception. Journal of Phonetics, 95, 101189. https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2022.101189
- Swerts, M., & Vroomen, J. (2015). Accent shifts in spoken noun phrases affect verification latencies of listeners in Dutch but not Canadian French. Journal of Phonetics, 52, 170–182. https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2015.07.005
- Ordin, M., & Polyanskaya, L. (2014). Development of timing patterns in first and second languages. System, 42, 244–257. https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2013.12.004
- Takahashi, C. (2023). L1 vowel perceptual boundary shift as a result of L2 vowel learning. Journal of Phonetics, 100, 101265. https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2023.101265
- Cho, M.-H., & Lee, S. (2016). The impact of different L1 and L2 learning experience in the acquisition of L1 phonological processes. Language Sciences, 56, 30–44. https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2016.02.006
- Deng, X., & Yeung, H. H. (2025). The perception of accented English by Mandarin learners of English: Revisiting the interlanguage speech intelligibility benefit. Journal of Phonetics, 112, 101444. https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2025.101444
- Bohn, O.-S., & Best, C. T. (2012). Native-language phonetic and phonological influences on perception of American English approximants by Danish and German listeners. Journal of Phonetics, 40(1), 109–128. https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2011.08.002
- Verbeke, G., & Simon, E. (2023). Listening to accents: Comprehensibility, accentedness and intelligibility of native and non-native English speech. Lingua, 292, 103572. https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2023.103572